[PATCH v2] PCI/MSI: Don't touch MSI bits when the PCI device is disconnected
Oliver O'Halloran
oohall at gmail.com
Mon Nov 12 16:49:59 AEDT 2018
On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 23:06 +0000, Alex_Gagniuc at Dellteam.com wrote:
> On 11/08/2018 04:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 10:49:08PM +0000, Alex_Gagniuc at Dellteam.com wrote:
> > > In the case that we're trying to fix, this code executing is a result of
> > > the device being gone, so we can guarantee race-free operation. I agree
> > > that there is a race, in the general case. As far as checking the result
> > > for all F's, that's not an option when firmware crashes the system as a
> > > result of the mmio read/write. It's never pretty when firmware gets
> > > involved.
> >
> > If you have firmware that crashes the system when you try to read from a
> > PCI device that was hot-removed, that is broken firmware and needs to be
> > fixed. The kernel can not work around that as again, you will never win
> > that race.
>
> But it's not the firmware that crashes. It's linux as a result of a
> fatal error message from the firmware. And we can't fix that because FFS
> handling requires that the system reboots [1].
Do we know the exact circumsances that result in firmware requesting a
reboot? If it happen on any PCIe error I don't see what we can do to
prevent that beyond masking UEs entirely (are we even allowed to do
that on FFS systems?).
> If we're going to say that we don't want to support FFS because it's a
> separate code path, and different flow, that's fine. I am myself, not a
> fan of FFS. But if we're going to continue supporting it, I think we'll
> continue to have to resolve these sort of unintended consequences.
>
> Alex
>
> [1] ACPI 6.2, 18.1 - Hardware Errors and Error Sources
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list