[PATCH v6 07/18] of: dynamic: change type of of_{at,de}tach_node() to void
    Frank Rowand 
    frowand.list at gmail.com
       
    Thu Nov  8 01:55:14 AEDT 2018
    
    
  
On 11/7/18 4:08 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> frowand.list at gmail.com writes:
> 
>> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand at sony.com>
>>
>> of_attach_node() and of_detach_node() always return zero, so
>> their return value is meaningless.
> 
> But should they always return zero?
> 
> At least __of_attach_node_sysfs() can fail in several ways.
Sigh.  And of_reconfig_notify() can fail.  And at one point in the
history the return value of of_reconfig_notify() was returned by
of_attach_node() if of_reconfig_notify() failed.
> And there's also this in __of_detach_node() which should probably be
> returning an error:
> 
> 	if (WARN_ON(of_node_check_flag(np, OF_DETACHED)))
>         	return;
> 
> 
> Seems to me we should instead be fixing these to propagate errors,
> rather than hiding them?
The history of how of_attach_node() stopped propagating errors is
a bit more complex than I want to dig into at the moment.  So I'll
drop this patch from the series and add investigating this onto
my todo list.  I suspect that the result of investigating will be
that error return values should not be ignored in of_attach_node()
and of_detach_node(), but should instead be propagated to the
callers, as you suggest.
-Frank
> 
> cheers
> 
    
    
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list