[PATCH bpf-next v4 04/10] bpf: get kernel symbol addresses via syscall
Sandipan Das
sandipan at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu May 24 16:56:48 AEST 2018
This adds new two new fields to struct bpf_prog_info. For
multi-function programs, these fields can be used to pass
a list of kernel symbol addresses for all functions in a
given program to userspace using the bpf system call with
the BPF_OBJ_GET_INFO_BY_FD command.
When bpf_jit_kallsyms is enabled, we can get the address
of the corresponding kernel symbol for a callee function
and resolve the symbol's name. The address is determined
by adding the value of the call instruction's imm field
to __bpf_call_base. This offset gets assigned to the imm
field by the verifier.
For some architectures, such as powerpc64, the imm field
is not large enough to hold this offset.
We resolve this by:
[1] Assigning the subprog id to the imm field of a call
instruction in the verifier instead of the offset of
the callee's symbol's address from __bpf_call_base.
[2] Determining the address of a callee's corresponding
symbol by using the imm field as an index for the
list of kernel symbol addresses now available from
the program info.
Suggested-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel at iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
v3:
- Copy addresses to jited_ksyms only if bpf_dump_raw_ok()
is true.
- Move new fields to the end of bpf_prog_info to avoid
breaking userspace.
---
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 ++
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 7 +------
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index c3e502d06bc3..0be90965867d 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2205,6 +2205,8 @@ struct bpf_prog_info {
__u32 gpl_compatible:1;
__u64 netns_dev;
__u64 netns_ino;
+ __u32 nr_jited_ksyms;
+ __aligned_u64 jited_ksyms;
} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
struct bpf_map_info {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 0b4c94551001..068a4fc79ddb 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -1933,6 +1933,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct bpf_prog *prog,
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
info.jited_prog_len = 0;
info.xlated_prog_len = 0;
+ info.nr_jited_ksyms = 0;
goto done;
}
@@ -1981,6 +1982,30 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct bpf_prog *prog,
}
}
+ ulen = info.nr_jited_ksyms;
+ info.nr_jited_ksyms = prog->aux->func_cnt;
+ if (info.nr_jited_ksyms && ulen) {
+ if (bpf_dump_raw_ok()) {
+ u64 __user *user_ksyms;
+ ulong ksym_addr;
+ u32 i;
+
+ /* copy the address of the kernel symbol
+ * corresponding to each function
+ */
+ ulen = min_t(u32, info.nr_jited_ksyms, ulen);
+ user_ksyms = u64_to_user_ptr(info.jited_ksyms);
+ for (i = 0; i < ulen; i++) {
+ ksym_addr = (ulong) prog->aux->func[i]->bpf_func;
+ ksym_addr &= PAGE_MASK;
+ if (put_user((u64) ksym_addr, &user_ksyms[i]))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+ } else {
+ info.jited_ksyms = 0;
+ }
+ }
+
done:
if (copy_to_user(uinfo, &info, info_len) ||
put_user(info_len, &uattr->info.info_len))
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 559cb74ba29e..8c4d9d0fd3ab 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5426,17 +5426,12 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
* later look the same as if they were interpreted only.
*/
for (i = 0, insn = prog->insnsi; i < prog->len; i++, insn++) {
- unsigned long addr;
-
if (insn->code != (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL) ||
insn->src_reg != BPF_PSEUDO_CALL)
continue;
insn->off = env->insn_aux_data[i].call_imm;
subprog = find_subprog(env, i + insn->off + 1);
- addr = (unsigned long)func[subprog]->bpf_func;
- addr &= PAGE_MASK;
- insn->imm = (u64 (*)(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64))
- addr - __bpf_call_base;
+ insn->imm = subprog;
}
prog->jited = 1;
--
2.14.3
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list