[PATCH bpf v2 5/6] tools: bpftool: resolve calls without using imm field

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Fri, 18 May 2018 18:20:38 +0530, Sandipan Das wrote:
> Currently, we resolve the callee's address for a JITed function
> call by using the imm field of the call instruction as an offset
> from __bpf_call_base. If bpf_jit_kallsyms is enabled, we further
> use this address to get the callee's kernel symbol's name.
> 
> For some architectures, such as powerpc64, the imm field is not
> large enough to hold this offset. So, instead of assigning this
> offset to the imm field, the verifier now assigns the subprog
> id. Also, a list of kernel symbol addresses for all the JITed
> functions is provided in the program info. We now use the imm
> field as an index for this list to lookup a callee's symbol's
> address and resolve its name.
> 
> Suggested-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel at iogearbox.net>
> Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> v2:
>  - Order variables from longest to shortest
>  - Make sure that ksyms_ptr and ksyms_len are always initialized
>  - Simplify code

Thanks for the improvements!  Since there will be v3 two minor nit
picks still :)

>  tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c          | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/xlated_dumper.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/xlated_dumper.h |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> index 9bdfdf2d3fbe..e2f8f8f259fc 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> @@ -421,19 +421,26 @@ static int do_show(int argc, char **argv)
>  static int do_dump(int argc, char **argv)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
> +	unsigned long *addrs = NULL;
>  	struct dump_data dd = {};
>  	__u32 len = sizeof(info);
>  	unsigned int buf_size;
> +	unsigned int nr_addrs;
>  	char *filepath = NULL;
>  	bool opcodes = false;
>  	bool visual = false;
>  	unsigned char *buf;
>  	__u32 *member_len;
>  	__u64 *member_ptr;
> +	__u32 *ksyms_len;
> +	__u64 *ksyms_ptr;
>  	ssize_t n;
>  	int err;
>  	int fd;
>  
> +	ksyms_len = &info.nr_jited_ksyms;
> +	ksyms_ptr = &info.jited_ksyms;

I'm not sure why you need these, why not just access
info.nr_jited_ksyms and info.jited_ksyms directly?  "member" variables
are there because jited and xlated images get returned in different
member of struct bpf_prog_info.

>  	if (is_prefix(*argv, "jited")) {
>  		member_len = &info.jited_prog_len;
>  		member_ptr = &info.jited_prog_insns;
> @@ -496,10 +503,22 @@ static int do_dump(int argc, char **argv)
>  		return -1;
>  	}
>  
> +	nr_addrs = *ksyms_len;
> +	if (nr_addrs) {
> +		addrs = malloc(nr_addrs * sizeof(__u64));
> +		if (!addrs) {
> +			p_err("mem alloc failed");
> +			close(fd);
> +			goto err_free;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
>  
>  	*member_ptr = ptr_to_u64(buf);
>  	*member_len = buf_size;
> +	*ksyms_ptr = ptr_to_u64(addrs);
> +	*ksyms_len = nr_addrs;
>  
>  	err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &len);
>  	close(fd);
> @@ -513,6 +532,11 @@ static int do_dump(int argc, char **argv)
>  		goto err_free;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (*ksyms_len > nr_addrs) {
> +		p_err("too many addresses returned");
> +		goto err_free;
> +	}
> +
>  	if ((member_len == &info.jited_prog_len &&
>  	     info.jited_prog_insns == 0) ||
>  	    (member_len == &info.xlated_prog_len &&
> @@ -558,6 +582,9 @@ static int do_dump(int argc, char **argv)
>  			dump_xlated_cfg(buf, *member_len);
>  	} else {
>  		kernel_syms_load(&dd);
> +		dd.nr_jited_ksyms = *ksyms_len;
> +		dd.jited_ksyms = (__u64 *) *ksyms_ptr;
> +
>  		if (json_output)
>  			dump_xlated_json(&dd, buf, *member_len, opcodes);
>  		else

> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/xlated_dumper.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/xlated_dumper.c
> index 7a3173b76c16..fb065b55db6d 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/xlated_dumper.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/xlated_dumper.c
> @@ -203,6 +207,10 @@ static const char *print_call(void *private_data,
>  	unsigned long address = dd->address_call_base + insn->imm;
>  	struct kernel_sym *sym;
>  
> +	if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL &&
> +		(__u32) insn->imm < dd->nr_jited_ksyms)

Indentation seems off.

> +		address = dd->jited_ksyms[insn->imm];
> +
>  	sym = kernel_syms_search(dd, address);
>  	if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL)
>  		return print_call_pcrel(dd, sym, address, insn);