[PATCH] powerpc/lib: Remove .balign inside string functions for PPC32
Christophe LEROY
christophe.leroy at c-s.fr
Fri May 18 00:21:17 AEST 2018
Le 17/05/2018 à 15:46, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Thu, 17 May 2018 12:04:13 +0200 (CEST)
>> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at c-s.fr> wrote:
>>
>>> commit 87a156fb18fe1 ("Align hot loops of some string functions")
>>> degraded the performance of string functions by adding useless
>>> nops
>>>
>>> A simple benchmark on an 8xx calling 100000x a memchr() that
>>> matches the first byte runs in 41668 TB ticks before this patch
>>> and in 35986 TB ticks after this patch. So this gives an
>>> improvement of approx 10%
>>>
>>> Another benchmark doing the same with a memchr() matching the 128th
>>> byte runs in 1011365 TB ticks before this patch and 1005682 TB ticks
>>> after this patch, so regardless on the number of loops, removing
>>> those useless nops improves the test by 5683 TB ticks.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 87a156fb18fe1 ("Align hot loops of some string functions")
>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at c-s.fr>
>>> ---
>>> Was sent already as part of a serie optimising string functions.
>>> Resending on itself as it is independent of the other changes in the
>>> serie
>>>
>>> arch/powerpc/lib/string.S | 6 ++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/string.S b/arch/powerpc/lib/string.S
>>> index a787776822d8..a026d8fa8a99 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/string.S
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/string.S
>>> @@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ _GLOBAL(strncpy)
>>> mtctr r5
>>> addi r6,r3,-1
>>> addi r4,r4,-1
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
>>> .balign 16
>>> +#endif
>>> 1: lbzu r0,1(r4)
>>> cmpwi 0,r0,0
>>> stbu r0,1(r6)
>>
>> The ifdefs are a bit ugly, but you can't argue with the numbers. These
>> alignments should be IFETCH_ALIGN_BYTES, which is intended to optimise
>> the ifetch performance when you have such a loop (although there is
>> always a tradeoff for a single iteration).
>>
>> Would it make sense to define that for 32-bit as well, and you could use
>> it here instead of the ifdefs? Small CPUs could just use 0.
>
> Can we do it with a macro in the header, eg. like:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> #define IFETCH_BALIGN .balign IFETCH_ALIGN_BYTES
> #endif
>
> ...
>
> addi r4,r4,-1
> IFETCH_BALIGN
> 1: lbzu r0,1(r4)
>
>
Why not just define IFETCH_ALIGN_SHIFT for PPC32 as well in asm/cache.h
?, then replace the .balign 16 by .balign IFETCH_ALIGN_BYTES (or .align
IFETCH_ALIGN_SHIFT) ?
Christophe
> cheers
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list