linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the powerpc-fixes tree
Michael Ellerman
mpe at ellerman.id.au
Thu May 10 10:45:02 AEST 2018
Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h
>
> between commit:
>
> edf6a2dfe388 ("powerpc/trace/syscalls: Update syscall name matching logic to account for ppc_ prefix")
>
> from the powerpc-fixes tree and commit:
>
> c3e59d778403 ("powerpc64/ftrace: Rearrange #ifdef sections in ftrace.h")
>
> from the powerpc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> Michael, I think the version in your merge branch is not quite right ...
Yep.
Don't do merges after midnight kids.
I've pushed a fixed version, which I think matches yours.
I'll resolve it in my next when I merge my fixes & next later in the
cycle.
cheers
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list