[PATCH v3] powerpc, pkey: make protection key 0 less special

Michal Suchánek msuchanek at suse.de
Thu May 10 01:43:35 AEST 2018


On Fri,  4 May 2018 12:22:58 -0700
Ram Pai <linuxram at us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Applications need the ability to associate an address-range with some
> key and latter revert to its initial default key. Pkey-0 comes close
> to providing this function but falls short, because the current
> implementation disallows applications to explicitly associate pkey-0
> to the address range.

Is there any way for the application to determine which key is the
default one associated with all address space until the application
installs its own key associations?

It seems it is somehow assumed this is key 0 but I did not find it
documented anywhere nor did I notice an interface for determining the
default key.

Thanks

Michal

> 
> Lets make pkey-0 less special and treat it almost like any other key.
> Thus it can be explicitly associated with any address range, and can
> be freed. This gives the application more flexibility and power.  The
> ability to free pkey-0 must be used responsibily, since pkey-0 is
> associated with almost all address-range by default.
> 
> Even with this change pkey-0 continues to be slightly more special
> from the following point of view.
> (a) it is implicitly allocated.
> (b) it is the default key assigned to any address-range.
> (c) its permissions cannot be modified by userspace.
> 
> NOTE: (c) is specific to powerpc only. pkey-0 is associated by default
> with all pages including kernel pages, and pkeys are also active in
> kernel mode. If any permission is denied on pkey-0, the kernel running
> in the context of the application will be unable to operate.
> 
> Tested on powerpc.
> 
> cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
> cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen at intel.com>
> cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe at ellerman.id.au>
> cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo at kernel.org>
> cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram at us.ibm.com>
> ---
> History:
> 
> 	v3: . Corrected a comment in arch_set_user_pkey_access().
> 	    . Clarified the header, to capture the notion that
> 	      pkey-0 permissions cannot be modified by userspace on
> powerpc. -- comment from Thiago
> 
> 	v2: . mm_pkey_is_allocated() continued to treat pkey-0
> special. fixed it.
> 
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h |   22 ++++++++++++++++++----
>  arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c          |   26 +++++++++++++++-----------
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h index 0409c80..31a6976 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
> @@ -101,10 +101,14 @@ static inline u16 pte_to_pkey_bits(u64 pteflags)
>  
>  static inline bool mm_pkey_is_allocated(struct mm_struct *mm, int
> pkey) {
> -	/* A reserved key is never considered as 'explicitly
> allocated' */
> -	return ((pkey < arch_max_pkey()) &&
> -		!__mm_pkey_is_reserved(pkey) &&
> -		__mm_pkey_is_allocated(mm, pkey));
> +	if (pkey < 0 || pkey >= arch_max_pkey())
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/* Reserved keys are never allocated. */
> +	if (__mm_pkey_is_reserved(pkey))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return __mm_pkey_is_allocated(mm, pkey);
>  }
>  
>  extern void __arch_activate_pkey(int pkey);
> @@ -200,6 +204,16 @@ static inline int
> arch_set_user_pkey_access(struct task_struct *tsk, int pkey, {
>  	if (static_branch_likely(&pkey_disabled))
>  		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * userspace should not change pkey-0 permissions.
> +	 * pkey-0 is associated with every page in the kernel.
> +	 * If userspace denies any permission on pkey-0, the
> +	 * kernel cannot operate.
> +	 */
> +	if (!pkey)
> +		return init_val ? -EINVAL : 0;
> +
>  	return __arch_set_user_pkey_access(tsk, pkey, init_val);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
> index 0eafdf0..d6873b4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
> @@ -119,16 +119,21 @@ int pkey_initialize(void)
>  #else
>  	os_reserved = 0;
>  #endif
> +	/* Bits are in LE format. */
>  	initial_allocation_mask = ~0x0;
> +
> +	/* register mask is in BE format */
>  	pkey_amr_uamor_mask = ~0x0ul;
>  	pkey_iamr_mask = ~0x0ul;
> -	/*
> -	 * key 0, 1 are reserved.
> -	 * key 0 is the default key, which allows read/write/execute.
> -	 * key 1 is recommended not to be used. PowerISA(3.0) page
> 1015,
> -	 * programming note.
> -	 */
> -	for (i = 2; i < (pkeys_total - os_reserved); i++) {
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < (pkeys_total - os_reserved); i++) {
> +		/*
> +		 * key 1 is recommended not to be used.
> +		 * PowerISA(3.0) page 1015,
> +		 */
> +		if (i == 1)
> +			continue;
> +
>  		initial_allocation_mask &= ~(0x1 << i);
>  		pkey_amr_uamor_mask &= ~(0x3ul << pkeyshift(i));
>  		pkey_iamr_mask &= ~(0x1ul << pkeyshift(i));
> @@ -142,7 +147,9 @@ void pkey_mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	if (static_branch_likely(&pkey_disabled))
>  		return;
> -	mm_pkey_allocation_map(mm) = initial_allocation_mask;
> +
> +	/* allocate key-0 by default */
> +	mm_pkey_allocation_map(mm) = initial_allocation_mask | 0x1;
>  	/* -1 means unallocated or invalid */
>  	mm->context.execute_only_pkey = -1;
>  }
> @@ -407,9 +414,6 @@ static bool pkey_access_permitted(int pkey, bool
> write, bool execute) int pkey_shift;
>  	u64 amr;
>  
> -	if (!pkey)
> -		return true;
> -
>  	if (!is_pkey_enabled(pkey))
>  		return true;
>  



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list