[PATCH v2] powerpc: do not allow userspace to modify execute-only pkey
Ram Pai
linuxram at us.ibm.com
Sat May 5 05:56:00 AEST 2018
When mprotect(....,PROT_EXEC) is called, the kernel allocates a
execute-only pkey and associates the pkey with the given address space.
The permission of this key should not be modifiable from userspace.
However a bug in the current implementation lets the permissions on the
key modifiable from userspace.
Whenever a key is allocated through mm_pkey_alloc(), the kernel programs
the UAMOR register to allow userspace to change permissions on the key.
This is fine for keys explicitly allocated through the
sys_pkey_alloc(). But for execute-only pkey, it must be disallowed.
Restructured the code to fix the bug.
cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: Michael Ellermen <mpe at ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram at us.ibm.com>
---
History:
v2: Thiago noticed a bug -- __execute_only_pkey() will always fail
since it calls is_pkey_enabled() which always returns false
for execute_only key. is_pkey_enabled() returns false
because UAMOR bit for the execute_only key is and never be set.
Fixed it.
arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h | 24 ++++------------
arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
index 31a6976..3a9b82b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
@@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ static inline bool mm_pkey_is_allocated(struct mm_struct *mm, int pkey)
extern void __arch_activate_pkey(int pkey);
extern void __arch_deactivate_pkey(int pkey);
+extern int __mm_pkey_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm);
+
/*
* Returns a positive, 5-bit key on success, or -1 on failure.
* Relies on the mmap_sem to protect against concurrency in mm_pkey_alloc() and
@@ -120,29 +122,14 @@ static inline bool mm_pkey_is_allocated(struct mm_struct *mm, int pkey)
*/
static inline int mm_pkey_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
- /*
- * Note: this is the one and only place we make sure that the pkey is
- * valid as far as the hardware is concerned. The rest of the kernel
- * trusts that only good, valid pkeys come out of here.
- */
- u32 all_pkeys_mask = (u32)(~(0x0));
int ret;
if (static_branch_likely(&pkey_disabled))
return -1;
+ ret = __mm_pkey_alloc(mm);
/*
- * Are we out of pkeys? We must handle this specially because ffz()
- * behavior is undefined if there are no zeros.
- */
- if (mm_pkey_allocation_map(mm) == all_pkeys_mask)
- return -1;
-
- ret = ffz((u32)mm_pkey_allocation_map(mm));
- __mm_pkey_allocated(mm, ret);
-
- /*
- * Enable the key in the hardware
+ * Enable userspace to modify the key permissions.
*/
if (ret > 0)
__arch_activate_pkey(ret);
@@ -158,7 +145,8 @@ static inline int mm_pkey_free(struct mm_struct *mm, int pkey)
return -EINVAL;
/*
- * Disable the key in the hardware
+ * Reset the key and disable userspace
+ * from modifying the key permissions.
*/
__arch_deactivate_pkey(pkey);
__mm_pkey_free(mm, pkey);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
index d6873b4..e81d59e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
@@ -190,6 +190,9 @@ static inline void write_uamor(u64 value)
mtspr(SPRN_UAMOR, value);
}
+/*
+ * return true if userspace can modify the pkey permissions.
+ */
static bool is_pkey_enabled(int pkey)
{
u64 uamor = read_uamor();
@@ -228,7 +231,10 @@ static void pkey_status_change(int pkey, bool enable)
init_amr(pkey, 0x0);
init_iamr(pkey, 0x0);
- /* Enable/disable key */
+ /*
+ * Enable/disable userspace to/from modifying the permissions
+ * on the key
+ */
old_uamor = read_uamor();
if (enable)
old_uamor |= (0x3ul << pkeyshift(pkey));
@@ -247,19 +253,35 @@ void __arch_deactivate_pkey(int pkey)
pkey_status_change(pkey, false);
}
-/*
- * Set the access rights in AMR IAMR and UAMOR registers for @pkey to that
- * specified in @init_val.
- */
-int __arch_set_user_pkey_access(struct task_struct *tsk, int pkey,
+int __mm_pkey_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ /*
+ * Note: this is the one and only place we make sure that the pkey is
+ * valid as far as the hardware is concerned. The rest of the kernel
+ * trusts that only good, valid pkeys come out of here.
+ */
+ u32 all_pkeys_mask = (u32)(~(0x0));
+ int ret;
+
+ /*
+ * Are we out of pkeys? We must handle this specially because ffz()
+ * behavior is undefined if there are no zeros.
+ */
+ if (mm_pkey_allocation_map(mm) == all_pkeys_mask)
+ return -1;
+
+ ret = ffz((u32)mm_pkey_allocation_map(mm));
+ __mm_pkey_allocated(mm, ret);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int set_user_pkey_access(struct task_struct *tsk, int pkey,
unsigned long init_val)
{
u64 new_amr_bits = 0x0ul;
u64 new_iamr_bits = 0x0ul;
- if (!is_pkey_enabled(pkey))
- return -EINVAL;
-
if (init_val & PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE) {
if (!pkey_execute_disable_supported)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -277,6 +299,19 @@ int __arch_set_user_pkey_access(struct task_struct *tsk, int pkey,
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * Set the access rights in AMR IAMR and UAMOR registers for @pkey to that
+ * specified in @init_val.
+ */
+int __arch_set_user_pkey_access(struct task_struct *tsk, int pkey,
+ unsigned long init_val)
+{
+ if (!is_pkey_enabled(pkey))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return set_user_pkey_access(tsk, pkey, init_val);
+}
+
void thread_pkey_regs_save(struct thread_struct *thread)
{
if (static_branch_likely(&pkey_disabled))
@@ -336,7 +371,7 @@ int __execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm)
/* Do we need to assign a pkey for mm's execute-only maps? */
if (execute_only_pkey == -1) {
/* Go allocate one to use, which might fail */
- execute_only_pkey = mm_pkey_alloc(mm);
+ execute_only_pkey = __mm_pkey_alloc(mm);
if (execute_only_pkey < 0)
return -1;
need_to_set_mm_pkey = true;
@@ -355,7 +390,7 @@ int __execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm)
* Set up AMR so that it denies access for everything other than
* execution.
*/
- ret = __arch_set_user_pkey_access(current, execute_only_pkey,
+ ret = set_user_pkey_access(current, execute_only_pkey,
PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS |
PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE);
/*
--
1.7.1
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list