[PATCH 13/13] powerpc/eeh: Refactor report functions

Michael Ellerman mpe at ellerman.id.au
Thu May 3 23:27:12 AEST 2018


Sam Bobroff <sbobroff at linux.ibm.com> writes:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
> index eb4feee81ff4..1c4336dcf9f5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,25 @@ static int eeh_result_priority(enum pci_ers_result result)
>  	}
>  };
>  
> +const char *pci_ers_result_name(enum pci_ers_result r)
> +{
> +	switch (r) {
> +	case PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE: return "none";
> +	case PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER: return "can recover";
> +	case PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET: return "need reset";
> +	case PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT: return "disconnect";
> +	case PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED: return "recovered";
> +	case PCI_ERS_RESULT_NO_AER_DRIVER: return "no AER driver";
> +	default:
> +		WARN_ONCE(1, "Unknown result type");
> +		return "unknown";
> +	}
> +};
> +
> +#define eeh_infoline(EDEV, FMT, ...) \
> +pr_info("EEH: PE#%x (PCI %s): " pr_fmt(FMT) "\n", EDEV->pe_config_addr, \
> +((EDEV->pdev) ? dev_name(&EDEV->pdev->dev) : "NONE"), ##__VA_ARGS__)

Ooof, I guess.

It would be nicer as a function.

"infoline" annoys me for some reason, "eeh_info" ?

> @@ -223,123 +242,118 @@ static void eeh_set_irq_state(struct eeh_pe *root, bool enable)
>  				}
>  }
>  
> +static void eeh_pe_report(const char *name, struct eeh_pe *root,
> +			  enum pci_ers_result (*fn)(struct eeh_dev *,
> +						    struct pci_driver *),
> +			  enum pci_ers_result *result)
> +{
> +	struct eeh_pe *pe;
> +	struct eeh_dev *edev, *tmp;
> +	enum pci_ers_result new_result;
> +
> +	pr_info("EEH: Beginning: '%s'\n", name);
> +	eeh_for_each_pe(root, pe) {
> +		eeh_pe_for_each_dev(pe, edev, tmp) {

This should be in a separate function.

> +			device_lock(&edev->pdev->dev);
> +			if (eeh_edev_actionable(edev)) {
> +				struct pci_driver *driver;
> +
> +				driver = eeh_pcid_get(edev->pdev);
> +
> +				if (!driver)
> +					eeh_infoline(edev, "no driver");
> +				else if (!driver->err_handler)
> +					eeh_infoline(edev,
> +						     "driver not EEH aware");
> +				else if (edev->mode & EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER)
> +					eeh_infoline(edev,
> +						     "driver bound too late");
> +				else {
> +					new_result = fn(edev, driver);
> +					eeh_infoline(edev,
> +						"%s driver reports: '%s'",
> +						driver->name,
> +						pci_ers_result_name(new_result));
> +					if (result)
> +						*result = merge_result(*result,
> +								       new_result);
> +				}
> +				if (driver)
> +					eeh_pcid_put(edev->pdev);
> +			} else {
> +				eeh_infoline(edev, "not actionable (%d,%d,%d)",
> +					     !!edev->pdev,
> +					     !eeh_dev_removed(edev),
> +					     !eeh_pe_passed(edev->pe));
> +			}
> +			device_unlock(&edev->pdev->dev);

^^^


cheers


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list