[PATCH 13/13] powerpc/eeh: Refactor report functions
Michael Ellerman
mpe at ellerman.id.au
Thu May 3 23:27:12 AEST 2018
Sam Bobroff <sbobroff at linux.ibm.com> writes:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
> index eb4feee81ff4..1c4336dcf9f5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,25 @@ static int eeh_result_priority(enum pci_ers_result result)
> }
> };
>
> +const char *pci_ers_result_name(enum pci_ers_result r)
> +{
> + switch (r) {
> + case PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE: return "none";
> + case PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER: return "can recover";
> + case PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET: return "need reset";
> + case PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT: return "disconnect";
> + case PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED: return "recovered";
> + case PCI_ERS_RESULT_NO_AER_DRIVER: return "no AER driver";
> + default:
> + WARN_ONCE(1, "Unknown result type");
> + return "unknown";
> + }
> +};
> +
> +#define eeh_infoline(EDEV, FMT, ...) \
> +pr_info("EEH: PE#%x (PCI %s): " pr_fmt(FMT) "\n", EDEV->pe_config_addr, \
> +((EDEV->pdev) ? dev_name(&EDEV->pdev->dev) : "NONE"), ##__VA_ARGS__)
Ooof, I guess.
It would be nicer as a function.
"infoline" annoys me for some reason, "eeh_info" ?
> @@ -223,123 +242,118 @@ static void eeh_set_irq_state(struct eeh_pe *root, bool enable)
> }
> }
>
> +static void eeh_pe_report(const char *name, struct eeh_pe *root,
> + enum pci_ers_result (*fn)(struct eeh_dev *,
> + struct pci_driver *),
> + enum pci_ers_result *result)
> +{
> + struct eeh_pe *pe;
> + struct eeh_dev *edev, *tmp;
> + enum pci_ers_result new_result;
> +
> + pr_info("EEH: Beginning: '%s'\n", name);
> + eeh_for_each_pe(root, pe) {
> + eeh_pe_for_each_dev(pe, edev, tmp) {
This should be in a separate function.
> + device_lock(&edev->pdev->dev);
> + if (eeh_edev_actionable(edev)) {
> + struct pci_driver *driver;
> +
> + driver = eeh_pcid_get(edev->pdev);
> +
> + if (!driver)
> + eeh_infoline(edev, "no driver");
> + else if (!driver->err_handler)
> + eeh_infoline(edev,
> + "driver not EEH aware");
> + else if (edev->mode & EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER)
> + eeh_infoline(edev,
> + "driver bound too late");
> + else {
> + new_result = fn(edev, driver);
> + eeh_infoline(edev,
> + "%s driver reports: '%s'",
> + driver->name,
> + pci_ers_result_name(new_result));
> + if (result)
> + *result = merge_result(*result,
> + new_result);
> + }
> + if (driver)
> + eeh_pcid_put(edev->pdev);
> + } else {
> + eeh_infoline(edev, "not actionable (%d,%d,%d)",
> + !!edev->pdev,
> + !eeh_dev_removed(edev),
> + !eeh_pe_passed(edev->pe));
> + }
> + device_unlock(&edev->pdev->dev);
^^^
cheers
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list