Aw: Re: RFC on writel and writel_relaxed
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Wed Mar 28 21:20:16 AEDT 2018
On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 12:13 +0200, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> >
> > Yeah so that other trick I'm talking about is also used for timing
> > accuracy.
> >
> > For example, let's say I have a device with a reset bit and the spec
> > says the reset bit needs to be set for at least 10us.
> >
> > This is wrong:
> >
> > writel(1, RESET_REG);
> > usleep(10);
> > writel(0, RESET_REG);
> >
> > Because of write posting, the first write might arrive to the device
> > right before the second one.
> >
>
> Does not write posting only concern PCI? This seems to be a different topic. Furthermore
> write posting should not include write reordering...
Nobody's talking about re-ordering and no, write posting is rather
common practice on a whole lot of different busses, not just PCI(e).
Cheers,
Ben.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list