[RFC PATCH 1/1] powerpc/ftrace: Exclude real mode code from
Steven Rostedt
rostedt at goodmis.org
Thu Mar 8 04:45:53 AEDT 2018
On Wed, 7 Mar 2018 22:16:19 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> We can't take a trap in most parts of real mode code. Instead of adding
> the 'notrace' annotation to all C functions that can be invoked from
> real mode, detect that we are in real mode on ftrace entry and return
> back.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> This RFC only handles -mprofile-kernel to demonstrate the approach being
> considered. We will need to handle other ftrace entry if we decide to
> continue down this path.
I do prefer this trade off.
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_mprofile.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_mprofile.S
> index 3f3e81852422..ecc0e8e38ead 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_mprofile.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_mprofile.S
> @@ -56,6 +56,21 @@ _GLOBAL(ftrace_caller)
>
> /* Load special regs for save below */
> mfmsr r8
> +
> + /* Only proceed if we are not in real mode and can take interrupts */
> + andi. r9, r8, MSR_IR|MSR_DR|MSR_RI
> + cmpdi r9, MSR_IR|MSR_DR|MSR_RI
> + beq 1f
OK, I assume this check and branch is negligible compared to the mfmsr
call?
-- Steve
> + mflr r8
> + mtctr r8
> + REST_GPR(9, r1)
> + REST_GPR(8, r1)
> + addi r1, r1, SWITCH_FRAME_SIZE
> + ld r0, LRSAVE(r1)
> + mtlr r0
> + bctr
> +
> +1:
> mfctr r9
> mfxer r10
> mfcr r11
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list