[PATCH v13 15/24] selftests/vm: powerpc implementation for generic abstraction
Dave Hansen
dave.hansen at intel.com
Thu Jun 21 01:06:25 AEST 2018
> +static inline u32 *siginfo_get_pkey_ptr(siginfo_t *si)
> +{
> +#ifdef si_pkey
> + return &si->si_pkey;
> +#else
> + return (u32 *)(((u8 *)si) + si_pkey_offset);
> +#endif
> }
FWIW, this isn't ppc-specific.
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
> index f43a319..88dfa40 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
> @@ -197,17 +197,18 @@ void dump_mem(void *dumpme, int len_bytes)
>
> int pkey_faults;
> int last_si_pkey = -1;
> +void pkey_access_allow(int pkey);
> void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext)
> {
> ucontext_t *uctxt = vucontext;
> int trapno;
> unsigned long ip;
> char *fpregs;
> +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) /* arch */
> pkey_reg_t *pkey_reg_ptr;
> - u64 siginfo_pkey;
> +#endif /* defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) */
> + u32 siginfo_pkey;
> u32 *si_pkey_ptr;
> - int pkey_reg_offset;
> - fpregset_t fpregset;
>
> dprint_in_signal = 1;
> dprintf1(">>>>===============SIGSEGV============================\n");
> @@ -217,12 +218,14 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext)
>
> trapno = uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_TRAPNO];
> ip = uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_IP_IDX];
> - fpregset = uctxt->uc_mcontext.fpregs;
> - fpregs = (void *)fpregset;
> + fpregs = (char *) uctxt->uc_mcontext.fpregs;
>
> dprintf2("%s() trapno: %d ip: 0x%016lx info->si_code: %s/%d\n",
> __func__, trapno, ip, si_code_str(si->si_code),
> si->si_code);
> +
> +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) /* arch */
> +
> #ifdef __i386__
> /*
> * 32-bit has some extra padding so that userspace can tell whether
> @@ -230,20 +233,28 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext)
> * state. We just assume that it is here.
> */
> fpregs += 0x70;
> -#endif
> - pkey_reg_offset = pkey_reg_xstate_offset();
> - pkey_reg_ptr = (void *)(&fpregs[pkey_reg_offset]);
> +#endif /* __i386__ */
>
> - dprintf1("siginfo: %p\n", si);
> - dprintf1(" fpregs: %p\n", fpregs);
> + pkey_reg_ptr = (void *)(&fpregs[pkey_reg_xstate_offset()]);
> /*
> - * If we got a PKEY fault, we *HAVE* to have at least one bit set in
> + * If we got a key fault, we *HAVE* to have at least one bit set in
> * here.
> */
> dprintf1("pkey_reg_xstate_offset: %d\n", pkey_reg_xstate_offset());
> if (DEBUG_LEVEL > 4)
> dump_mem(pkey_reg_ptr - 128, 256);
> pkey_assert(*pkey_reg_ptr);
> +#endif /* defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) */
The series up to this point has been looking pretty nice and broken out
and easy to read. It goes off the rails a bit here. Adding #ifdefs and..
> + dprintf1("siginfo: %p\n", si);
> + dprintf1(" fpregs: %p\n", fpregs);
> +
> + si_pkey_ptr = siginfo_get_pkey_ptr(si);
> + dprintf1("si_pkey_ptr: %p\n", si_pkey_ptr);
> + dump_mem(si_pkey_ptr - 8, 24);
> + siginfo_pkey = *si_pkey_ptr;
> + pkey_assert(siginfo_pkey < NR_PKEYS);
> + last_si_pkey = siginfo_pkey;
>
> if ((si->si_code == SEGV_MAPERR) ||
> (si->si_code == SEGV_ACCERR) ||
> @@ -252,22 +263,21 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext)
> exit(4);
> }
>
> - si_pkey_ptr = (u32 *)(((u8 *)si) + si_pkey_offset);
> - dprintf1("si_pkey_ptr: %p\n", si_pkey_ptr);
> - dump_mem((u8 *)si_pkey_ptr - 8, 24);
> - siginfo_pkey = *si_pkey_ptr;
> - pkey_assert(siginfo_pkey < NR_PKEYS);
> - last_si_pkey = siginfo_pkey;
Moving random code around with no explanation.
> - dprintf1("signal pkey_reg from xsave: "PKEY_REG_FMT"\n", *pkey_reg_ptr);
> /*
> * need __read_pkey_reg() version so we do not do shadow_pkey_reg
> * checking
> */
> dprintf1("signal pkey_reg from pkey_reg: "PKEY_REG_FMT"\n",
> __read_pkey_reg());
> - dprintf1("pkey from siginfo: %jx\n", siginfo_pkey);
> - *(u64 *)pkey_reg_ptr = 0x00000000;
> +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) /* arch */
> + dprintf1("signal pkey_reg from xsave: "PKEY_REG_FMT"\n", *pkey_reg_ptr);
> + *(u64 *)pkey_reg_ptr &= clear_pkey_flags(siginfo_pkey,
> + PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS | PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE);
> +#elif __powerpc64__
> + pkey_access_allow(siginfo_pkey);
> +#endif
> + shadow_pkey_reg &= clear_pkey_flags(siginfo_pkey,
> + PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS | PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE);
> dprintf1("WARNING: set PKEY_REG=0 to allow faulting instruction "
> "to continue\n");
> pkey_faults++;
> @@ -1331,9 +1341,8 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey)
> madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED);
> lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch);
> do_not_expect_pkey_fault("executing on PROT_EXEC memory");
> - ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1);
> - dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents);
> - expected_pkey_fault(pkey);
> +
> + expect_fault_on_read_execonly_key(p1, pkey);
> }
While none of this is a deal-breaker (as I said, I feel like the
selftests/ rules are a bit more lax) this does kinda break the illusion
of a nice, broken out series.
Could you address this a bit in the changelog at least, please?
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list