[PATCH -next] ocxl: Fix missing unlock on error in afu_ioctl_enable_p9_wait()

Frederic Barrat fbarrat at linux.ibm.com
Tue Jun 5 22:57:00 AEST 2018



Le 05/06/2018 à 11:16, Wei Yongjun a écrit :
> Add the missing unlock before return from function
> afu_ioctl_enable_p9_wait() in the error handling case.
> 
> Fixes: e948e06fc63a ("ocxl: Expose the thread_id needed for wait on POWER9")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1 at huawei.com>
> ---
>   drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c | 4 +++-
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
> index 33ae46c..e6a6074 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
> @@ -139,8 +139,10 @@ static long afu_ioctl_enable_p9_wait(struct ocxl_context *ctx,
>   		// Locks both status & tidr
>   		mutex_lock(&ctx->status_mutex);
>   		if (!ctx->tidr) {
> -			if (set_thread_tidr(current))
> +			if (set_thread_tidr(current)) {
> +				mutex_unlock(&ctx->status_mutex);
>   				return -ENOENT;
> +			}

O_o   Thanks for fixing it

Acked-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat at linux.vnet.ibm.com>


>   			ctx->tidr = current->thread.tidr;
>   		}
> 



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list