[PATCH 25/26] KVM: PPC: Book3S PR: Support TAR handling for PR KVM HTM.

[Simon Guo]

Hi Paul,
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 03:02:58PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 06:11:38PM +0800, wei.guo.simon at gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon at gmail.com>
> > 
> > Currently guest kernel doesn't handle TAR fac unavailable and it always
> > runs with TAR bit on. PR KVM will lazily enable TAR. TAR is not a
> > frequent-use reg and it is not included in SVCPU struct.
> > 
> > To make it work for transaction memory at PR KVM:
> > 1). Flush/giveup TAR at kvmppc_save_tm_pr().
> > 2) If we are receiving a TAR fac unavail exception inside a transaction,
> > the checkpointed TAR might be a TAR value from another process. So we need
> > treclaim the transaction, then load the desired TAR value into reg, and
> > perform trecheckpoint.
> > 3) Load TAR facility at kvmppc_restore_tm_pr() when TM active.
> > The reason we always loads TAR when restoring TM is that:
> > If we don't do this way, when there is a TAR fac unavailable exception
> > during TM active:
> > case 1: it is the 1st TAR fac unavail exception after tbegin.
> > vcpu->arch.tar should be reloaded as checkpoint tar val.
> > case 2: it is the 2nd or later TAR fac unavail exception after tbegin.
> > vcpu->arch.tar_tm should be reloaded as checkpoint tar val.
> > There will be unnecessary difficulty to handle the above 2 cases.
> > 
> > at the end of emulating treclaim., the correct TAR val need to be loaded
> > into reg if FSCR_TAR bit is on.
> > at the beginning of emulating trechkpt., TAR needs to be flushed so that
> > the right tar val can be copy into tar_tm.
> 
> Would it be simpler always to load up TAR when guest_MSR[TM] is 1?
> 
> Paul.
Sure. it will have a similar solution with math regs.
Thanks for the suggestion,

BR
- Simon