[PATCH 23/26] KVM: PPC: Book3S PR: add emulation for tabort. for privilege guest

[Simon Guo]

Hi Paul,
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 08:44:16PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 06:11:36PM +0800, wei.guo.simon at gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon at gmail.com>
> > 
> > Currently privilege guest will be run with TM disabled.
> > 
> > Although the privilege guest cannot initiate a new transaction,
> > it can use tabort to terminate its problem state's transaction.
> > So it is still necessary to emulate tabort. for privilege guest.
> > 
> > This patch adds emulation for tabort. of privilege guest.
> > 
> > Tested with:
> > https://github.com/justdoitqd/publicFiles/blob/master/test_tabort.c
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h |  1 +
> >  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c     | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c          |  2 +-
> >  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
> > index 524cd82..8bd454c 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
> > @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ extern void kvmppc_copy_from_svcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >  void kvmppc_save_tm_pr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> >  void kvmppc_restore_tm_pr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> >  void kvmppc_restore_tm_sprs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > +void kvmppc_save_tm_sprs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> 
> Why do you add this declaration, and change it from "static inline" to
> "inline" below, when this patch doesn't use it?  Also, making it
> "inline" is pointless if it has a caller outside the source file where
> it's defined (if gcc wants to inline uses of it inside the same source
> file, it will do so anyway even without the "inline" keyword.)
> 
> Paul.
It is a leave over of my previous rework. Sorry and I will remove
them.

Thanks,
- Simon