[cryptodev:master 130/134] aes_generic.c:undefined reference to `_restgpr_31_x'

[Segher Boessenkool]

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:29:01PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Segher Boessenkool
> <segher at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 08:43:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Segher Boessenkool
> 
> >> We could theoretically work around it by turning that into
> >> "#if defined(CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE) ||
> >> defined(CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES)", but that seems rather ugly.
> >>
> >> My earlier patch already tried to be more specific, turning very
> >> specific optimizations off rather than moving from -O2 to -Os,
> >> but that turned out to lead to significantly worse performance,
> >> where -Os improved performance slightly. Is there a way
> >> to ask powerpc compilers to use mostly -Os but not the
> >> specific thing that makes it link to _restgpr_31_x?
> >
> > There is no such thing, sorry.  Would be very hard to implement, and
> > older compilers will never get it, so it won't help you anyway :-(
> 
> We use -Os only for gcc-7.1 and higher, where it produces faster
> code for AES and avoids running into
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83356
> 
> > Maybe for now just enable it in crtsavres.S always, with a comment?
> > That -Os workaround is hopefully not going to live long either...
> 
> It depends on whether or how soon someone comes up with a
> better fix for PR83356.
> gcc-8.0.0 is currently not affected by it, so we could limit the
> workaround (and the hack in crtsavres.S) to gcc-7-only.

I guess you could enable the _x routines whenever you use ubsan?  Ubsan
will cause much bigger code growth than the handful of insns in those
routines?


Segher