[PATCH 0/6] DISCONTIGMEM support for PPC32
Jonathan Neuschäfer
j.neuschaefer at gmx.net
Thu Feb 22 10:31:58 AEDT 2018
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:02:25PM +0100, Christophe LEROY wrote:
[...]
> > > My question might me stupid, as I don't know PCC64 in deep, but when looking
> > > at page_is_ram() in arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c, I have the feeling the PPC64
> > > implements ram by blocks. Isn't it what you are trying to achieve ? Wouldn't
> > > it be feasible to map to what's done in PPC64 for PPC32 ?
> >
> > Using page_is_ram in __ioremap_caller and the same memblock-based
> > approach that's used on PPC64 on PPC32 *should* work, but I think due to
> > the following line in initmem_init, it won't:
> >
> > memblock_set_node(0, (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX, &memblock.memory, 0);
>
> Can't we just fix that ?
Turns out I was completely wrong about this. memblock_set_node as called
above only assigns all memory to node 0 and merges *adjacent* memblocks.
It doesn't merge the memblocks on the Wii, which are far apart.
So now I actually have a working patchset (coming soon), that's a good
deal shorter than this patchset, and hopefully won't break
CONFIG_HIGHMEM in the same way.
Thanks for your input! :)
Jonathan Neuschäfer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20180222/e00399c9/attachment.sig>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list