[PATCH v2] watchdog: add SPDX identifiers for watchdog subsystem

[William Breathitt Gray]

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 04:33:26PM +0100, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 07:13:43AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 02/20/2018 05:21 AM, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
>> > Hello William,
>> > 
>> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 07:49:55AM -0500, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:45:31AM +0100, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
>> > > > - Add SPDX identifier
>> > > > - Remove boiler plate license text
>> > > > - If MODULE_LICENSE and boiler plate does not match, go for boiler plate
>> > > >   license
>> > > > 
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson at gmail.com>
>> > > > Acked-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource at diasemi.com>
>> > > > Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax at opensource.cirrus.com>
>> > > > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at microchip.com>
>> > > > Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com>
>> > > > ---
>> > > > 
>> > > > Notes:
>> > > >     v2:
>> > > >     	- Put back removed copyright texts for meson_gxbb_wdt and coh901327_wdt
>> > > >     	- Change to BSD-3-Clause for meson_gxbb_wdt
>> > > >     v1: Please have an extra look at meson_gxbb_wdt.c
>> > > 
>> > > [...]
>> > > 
>> > > > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/ebc-c384_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/ebc-c384_wdt.c
>> > > > index 2170b275ea01..c173b6f5c866 100644
>> > > > --- a/drivers/watchdog/ebc-c384_wdt.c
>> > > > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/ebc-c384_wdt.c
>> > > > @@ -1,15 +1,8 @@
>> > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> > > > /*
>> > > >   * Watchdog timer driver for the WinSystems EBC-C384
>> > > >   * Copyright (C) 2016 William Breathitt Gray
>> > > >   *
>
>The copyright is untouched?
>
>> > > > - * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> > > > - * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2, as
>> > > > - * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> > > > - *
>> > > > - * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
>> > > > - * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> > > > - * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
>> > > > - * General Public License for more details.
>> > > >   */
>> > > > #include <linux/device.h>
>> > > > #include <linux/dmi.h>
>> > 
>> > Thank you for your feedback!
>> > > 
>> > > I have no problem with adding a SPDX line to the top of this file, but
>> > > use "SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only" as I was very intentional
>> > > with the selection of GPL version 2 only when I published this code.
>> > 
>> > SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> > Is GPL-2.0 only [1], so it respects your choice of license.

Ah, this should be fine then. :)

>> > 
>> > > 
>> > > Furthermore, please do not remove the existing copyright text; although
>> > 
>> 
>> It is not a matter if you CAN keep a copyright. You MUST NOT remove a copyright.
>> As long as you do, the series is
>> 
>> Nacked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux at roeck-us.net>
>> 
>> Guenter
>
>I'm sorry, I do not see where the copyright is removed unless you count
>the license text as part of the copyright.
>
>Can you please point it out?
>
>> 
>> > The copyright text:
>> > 
>> >   Copyright (C) 2016 William Breathitt Gray
>> > 
>> > Is still in the file.
>
>^^^
>
>> > 
>> > 
>> > > it's just boilerplate for some, I was careful with the selection of
>> > > these words, and I worry the SPDX line only -- despite its useful
>> > > conciseness -- may lead to misunderstandings about my intentioned
>> > > license for this code.
>> > 
>> > I'm not sure I understand your concerns here, the SPDX identifier is
>> > a shorthand for the GPL 2.0 only license. See [1] - Linux kernel licensing rules.
>> > 
>> > One of the biggest benefits with SPDX identifier is that it is hard to verify
>> > boiler plate licenses due to formatting, types, different formulations and so on.
>> > 
>> > If still worrying, I think we could keep the license text as
>> > well.

I'm sorry for the confusion, I should have wrote "license text" rather
than "copyright text" in my previous message. I agree with the benefits
of utilizing the SPDX identifier, and I see the addition of the SPDX
line as useful, but I would prefer the original license text remain as
well.

William Breathitt Gray

>> > 
>> > > 
>> > > For the time being, I can't Ack this patch with the changes it makes
>> > > currently:
>> > > 
>> > >          Nacked-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray at gmail.com>
>> > > 
>> > > William Breathitt Gray
>> > 
>> > Please let me know if I got you wrong at some point.
>> > 
>> > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/license-rules.rst
>> > 
>> > Best regards
>> > Marcus Folkesson
>> > 
>> 
>
>Best regards
>Marcus Folkesson