[RFC PATCH 10/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Correctly save/restore checkpointed sprs
Michael Neuling
mikey at neuling.org
Tue Feb 20 14:00:30 AEDT 2018
This needs a description of what you're trying to do. "Correctly" doesn't
really mean anything.
On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 11:22 +1100, Cyril Bur wrote:
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> -
> arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 9 +++----
> 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> index cd3ae80a6878..674f75c56172 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> @@ -859,6 +859,8 @@ static inline bool tm_enabled(struct task_struct *tsk)
> return tsk && tsk->thread.regs && (tsk->thread.regs->msr & MSR_TM);
> }
>
> +static inline void save_sprs(struct thread_struct *t);
> +
> static void tm_reclaim_thread(struct thread_struct *thr, uint8_t cause)
> {
> /*
> @@ -879,6 +881,8 @@ static void tm_reclaim_thread(struct thread_struct *thr,
> uint8_t cause)
> if (!MSR_TM_SUSPENDED(mfmsr()))
> return;
>
> + save_sprs(thr);
> +
> giveup_all(container_of(thr, struct task_struct, thread));
>
> tm_reclaim(thr, cause);
> @@ -991,6 +995,37 @@ void tm_recheckpoint(struct thread_struct *thread)
>
> __tm_recheckpoint(thread);
>
> + /*
> + * This is a stripped down restore_sprs(), we need to do this
> + * now as we might go straight out to userspace and currently
> + * the checkpointed values are on the CPU.
> + *
> + * TODO: Improve
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ALTIVEC))
> + mtspr(SPRN_VRSAVE, thread->vrsave);
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_DSCR)) {
> + u64 dscr = get_paca()->dscr_default;
> + if (thread->dscr_inherit)
> + dscr = thread->dscr;
> +
> + mtspr(SPRN_DSCR, dscr);
> + }
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)) {
> + /* The EBB regs aren't checkpointed */
> + mtspr(SPRN_FSCR, thread->fscr);
> +
> + mtspr(SPRN_TAR, thread->tar);
> + }
> +
> + /* I think we don't need to */
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
> + mtspr(SPRN_TIDR, thread->tidr);
> +#endif
Why are you touching all the above hunk?
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
> @@ -1193,6 +1228,11 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct
> *prev,
> #endif
>
> new_thread = &new->thread;
> + /*
> + * Why not &prev->thread; ?
> + * What is the difference between &prev->thread and
> + * ¤t->thread ?
> + */
Why not just work it out and FIX THE CODE, rather than just rabbiting on about
it! :-P
> old_thread = ¤t->thread;
>
> WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
> @@ -1237,8 +1277,16 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct
> *prev,
> /*
> * We need to save SPRs before treclaim/trecheckpoint as these will
> * change a number of them.
> + *
> + * Because we're now reclaiming on kernel entry, we've had to
> + * already save them. Don't do it again.
> + * Note: To deliver a signal in the signal context, we'll have
> + * turned off TM because we don't want the signal context to
> + * have the transactional state of the main thread - what if
> + * we go through switch to at that point? Can we?
> */
> - save_sprs(&prev->thread);
> + if (!prev->thread.regs || !MSR_TM_ACTIVE(prev->thread.regs->msr))
> + save_sprs(&prev->thread);
>
> /* Save FPU, Altivec, VSX and SPE state */
> giveup_all(prev);
> @@ -1260,8 +1308,13 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct
> *prev,
> * for this is we manually create a stack frame for new tasks that
> * directly returns through ret_from_fork() or
> * ret_from_kernel_thread(). See copy_thread() for details.
> + *
> + * It isn't stricly nessesary that we avoid the restore here
> + * because we'll simply restore again after the recheckpoint,
> + * but we can avoid it for performance reasons.
> */
> - restore_sprs(old_thread, new_thread);
> + if (!new_thread->regs || !MSR_TM_ACTIVE(new_thread->regs->msr))
> + restore_sprs(old_thread, new_thread);
>
> last = _switch(old_thread, new_thread);
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> index ca72d7391d40..16001987ba71 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -135,12 +135,9 @@ static void flush_tmregs_to_thread(struct task_struct
> *tsk)
> if ((!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_TM)) || (tsk != current))
> return;
>
> - if (MSR_TM_SUSPENDED(mfmsr())) {
> - tm_reclaim_current(TM_CAUSE_SIGNAL);
> - } else {
> - tm_enable();
> - tm_save_sprs(&(tsk->thread));
> - }
> + BUG_ON(MSR_TM_SUSPENDED(mfmsr()));
> + tm_enable();
> + tm_save_sprs(&(tsk->thread));
> }
> #else
> static inline void flush_tmregs_to_thread(struct task_struct *tsk) { }
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list