rtc-opal: Fix handling of firmware error codes, prevent busy loops
Michael Ellerman
mpe at ellerman.id.au
Tue Feb 6 16:22:47 AEDT 2018
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni at bootlin.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/08/2016 at 11:50:16 +1000, Stewart Smith wrote:
>> According to the OPAL docs:
>> https://github.com/open-power/skiboot/blob/skiboot-5.2.5/doc/opal-api/opal-rtc-read-3.txt
>> https://github.com/open-power/skiboot/blob/skiboot-5.2.5/doc/opal-api/opal-rtc-write-4.txt
>> OPAL_HARDWARE may be returned from OPAL_RTC_READ or OPAL_RTC_WRITE and this
>> indicates either a transient or permanent error.
>>
>> Prior to this patch, Linux was not dealing with OPAL_HARDWARE being a
>> permanent error particularly well, in that you could end up in a busy
>> loop.
>>
>> This was not too hard to trigger on an AMI BMC based OpenPOWER machine
>> doing a continuous "ipmitool mc reset cold" to the BMC, the result of
>> that being that we'd get stuck in an infinite loop in opal_get_rtc_time.
>>
>> We now retry a few times before returning the error higher up the stack.
>>
>> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Just a note to let you know that this patch should have gone through my
> tree but it was not sent to linux-rtc or me.
Sorry, I saw it had been languishing for a long time and assumed you'd
missed it.
Happy to revert/rework it if you're not happy with it.
> I guess what happened is that Michael cleaned up the Linux PPC patchwork
> queue.
Yeah I did.
In future I'll ping you if there's something that seems to have fallen
through the cracks.
cheers
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list