[PATCH] powerpc: Fix -mcpu= options for SPE-only compiler
Segher Boessenkool
segher at kernel.crashing.org
Sat Dec 29 22:40:15 AEDT 2018
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 02:32:07AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-12-26 at 17:45 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 02:15:11PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > GCC for Debian's "powerpcspe" architecture only supports 32-bit
> > > SPE targets, and using -mcpu=powerpc or -mcpu=powerpc64 is a fatal
> > > error.
> >
> > I don't see where your patch touches -mcpu=powerpc, and I don't see how
> > it would make a difference either?
[ I now see that error fwiw. Yuck. ]
> Look at the assignments that are conditional on HAS_BIARCH.
Sure, you change how HAS_BIARCH is set. That has more effects than just
not using -mcpu=powerpc (which is fine, but the message is confusing).
> > > +ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> > > ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
> > > ifdef CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> > > CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += -mcpu=power8
> > > @@ -177,6 +178,7 @@ endif
> > > else
> > > CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += -mcpu=powerpc64
> > > endif
> > > +endif
> >
> > How can CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64 be true while CONFIG_PPC64 is fals? That
> > does not make a lot of sense.
>
> But there is an "else" part here.
Yeah I see. It would be better to have fewer nested conditionals here
instead of more...
Segher
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list