[PATCH v1 03/13] powerpc/mm/32s: rework mmu_mapin_ram()
Christophe Leroy
christophe.leroy at c-s.fr
Wed Dec 19 01:15:49 AEDT 2018
Le 18/12/2018 à 15:07, Jonathan Neuschäfer a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 09:18:42AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> The only difference I see then are the flags. Everything else is seems
>> identical.
>>
>> I know you tried already, but would you mind trying once more with the
>> following change ?
>>
> [...]
>> - setbat(idx, PAGE_OFFSET + base, base, size, PAGE_KERNEL_TEXT);
>> + setbat(idx, PAGE_OFFSET + base, base, size, PAGE_KERNEL_X);
>
> Good call, with this workaround on top of patches 1-3, it boots again:
>
> # mount -t debugfs d /sys/kernel/debug
> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/powerpc/block_address_translation
> ---[ Instruction Block Address Translation ]---
> 0: 0xc0000000-0xc0ffffff 0x00000000 Kernel EXEC
> 1: -
> 2: 0xc1000000-0xc17fffff 0x01000000 Kernel EXEC
> 3: -
> 4: 0xd0000000-0xd1ffffff 0x10000000 Kernel EXEC
> 5: -
> 6: -
> 7: -
>
> ---[ Data Block Address Translation ]---
> 0: 0xc0000000-0xc0ffffff 0x00000000 Kernel RW
> 1: 0xfffe0000-0xffffffff 0x0d000000 Kernel RW no cache guarded
> 2: 0xc1000000-0xc17fffff 0x01000000 Kernel RW
> 3: -
> 4: 0xd0000000-0xd1ffffff 0x10000000 Kernel RW
> 5: -
> 6: -
> 7: -
>
>> I think we may have some code trying to modify the kernel text without using
>> code patching functions.
>
> Is there any faster way than to sprinkle some printks in setup_kernel
> and try to find the guilty piece of code this way?
Can you start with the serie
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=75072 ?
Christophe
>
>
> Jonathan
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list