[PATCH v5 0/5] powerpc: system call table generation support
Michael Ellerman
mpe at ellerman.id.au
Mon Dec 17 21:30:58 AEDT 2018
Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Hi Firoz,
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 02:32:45PM +0530, Firoz Khan wrote:
>> The purpose of this patch series is, we can easily
>> add/modify/delete system call table support by cha-
>> nging entry in syscall.tbl file instead of manually
>> changing many files. The other goal is to unify the
>> system call table generation support implementation
>> across all the architectures.
>>
>> The system call tables are in different format in
>> all architecture. It will be difficult to manually
>> add, modify or delete the system calls in the resp-
>> ective files manually. To make it easy by keeping a
>> script and which'll generate uapi header file and
>> syscall table file.
>>
>> syscall.tbl contains the list of available system
>> calls along with system call number and correspond-
>> ing entry point. Add a new system call in this arch-
>> itecture will be possible by adding new entry in
>> the syscall.tbl file.
>>
>> Adding a new table entry consisting of:
>> - System call number.
>> - ABI.
>> - System call name.
>> - Entry point name.
>> - Compat entry name, if required.
>> - spu entry name, if required.
>>
>> ARM, s390 and x86 architecuture does exist the sim-
>> ilar support. I leverage their implementation to
>> come up with a generic solution.
>>
>> I have done the same support for work for alpha,
>> ia64, m68k, microblaze, mips, parisc, sh, sparc,
>> and xtensa. Below mentioned git repository contains
>> more details about the workflow.
>>
>> https://github.com/frzkhn/system_call_table_generator/
>>
>> Finally, this is the ground work to solve the Y2038
>> issue. We need to add two dozen of system calls to
>> solve Y2038 issue. So this patch series will help to
>> add new system calls easily by adding new entry in the
>> syscall.tbl.
>>
>> Changes since v4:
>> - DOTSYM macro removed for ppc32, which was causing
>> the compilation error.
>>
>> Changes since v3:
>> - split compat syscall table out from native table.
>> - modified the script to add new line in the generated
>> file.
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> - modified/optimized the syscall.tbl to avoid duplicate
>> for the spu entries.
>> - updated the syscalltbl.sh to meet the above point.
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - optimized/updated the syscall table generation
>> scripts.
>> - fixed all mixed indentation issues in syscall.tbl.
>> - added "comments" in syscall_*.tbl.
>> - changed from generic-y to generated-y in Kbuild.
>>
>> Firoz Khan (5):
>> powerpc: add __NR_syscalls along with NR_syscalls
>> powerpc: move macro definition from asm/systbl.h
>> powerpc: add system call table generation support
>> powerpc: split compat syscall table out from native table
>> powerpc: generate uapi header and system call table files
>
> Tried to apply on linus "master" and linuxppc-dev(https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git) "merge" branch,
> both failed to apply series.
>
> # git am mbox
> Applying: powerpc: add __NR_syscalls along with NR_syscalls
> Applying: powerpc: move macro definition from asm/systbl.h
> Applying: powerpc: add system call table generation support
> Applying: powerpc: split compat syscall table out from native table
> Applying: powerpc: generate uapi header and system call table files
> error: patch failed: arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild:1
> error: arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild: patch does not apply
> Patch failed at 0005 powerpc: generate uapi header and system call table files
> Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
> When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
> If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
> To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
>
> Then, tried with linuxppc-dev(https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git) "next" branch,
> patch got applied, compiled with ppc64le_defconfig and booted on IBM Power8 box.
>
> # uname -r
> 4.20.0-rc2-gdd2690d2c
>
> Looks like patch series needs a rebase against the latest kernel versions.
No it's fine if it applies on next.
I can also fix up minor merge conflicts if there are any.
cheers
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list