[PATCH] ocxl: Simplify free_spa()

[Greg Kurz]

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 20:13:21 +1100
Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan at au1.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 11/12/18 7:57 pm, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > I now realize that I should have mentioned the real motivation for this
> > change. I'm working on refactoring the code so that we can use ocxl in a
> > KVM guest. The concept of link can be shared by both powernv and pseries
> > variants but the SPA is definitely a powernv only thingy. The benefit
> > of this patch is hence to kick 'struct link' out of free_spa() so that
> > it can be utimately moved to powernv specific code.
> > 
> > The initial version of this change was just moving the link->spa check
> > and link->spa = NULL to the callers, where it was quite obvious they're
> > not needed... Should I re-post this as two patches for clarity ?  
> 
> Ah, that makes much more sense.
> 
> If that's the case, then why not go all the way and change the function 
> signature while you're at it?
> 

Sure, will do.