[PATCH] ocxl: Simplify free_spa()
Frederic Barrat
fbarrat at linux.ibm.com
Tue Dec 11 03:14:59 AEDT 2018
Le 10/12/2018 à 16:15, Greg Kurz a écrit :
> The only users of free_spa() are alloc_link() and free_link(), and
> in both cases:
>
> - link->spa != NULL
>
> - free_spa(link) is immediatly followed by kfree(link)
>
> The check isn't needed, and it doesn't bring much to clear the link->spa
> pointer. Drop both.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug at kaod.org>
> ---
OK, that looks safe enough
Acked-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat at linux.ibm.com>
> drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c
> index 31695a078485..eed92055184d 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c
> @@ -352,11 +352,8 @@ static void free_spa(struct link *link)
> pr_debug("Freeing SPA for %x:%x:%x\n", link->domain, link->bus,
> link->dev);
>
> - if (spa && spa->spa_mem) {
> - free_pages((unsigned long) spa->spa_mem, spa->spa_order);
> - kfree(spa);
> - link->spa = NULL;
> - }
> + free_pages((unsigned long) spa->spa_mem, spa->spa_order);
> + kfree(spa);
> }
>
> static int alloc_link(struct pci_dev *dev, int PE_mask, struct link **out_link)
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list