[PATCH v2 26/34] dt-bindings: arm: Convert Renesas board/soc bindings to json-schema

Simon Horman horms at verge.net.au
Mon Dec 10 22:12:23 AEDT 2018


On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:38:42PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 1:44 PM Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 09:08:57AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:57 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Simon,
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:48 PM Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:32:15PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > > > Convert Renesas SoC bindings to DT schema format using json-schema.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cc: Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au>
> > > > > > Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm at gmail.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
> > > > > > Cc: linux-renesas-soc at vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt      | 151 ------------
> > > > > >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.yaml     | 218 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > >  2 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-)
> > > > > >  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt
> > > > > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.yaml
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Rob,
> > > > >
> > > > > what is this based on? I get a conflict when applying the .txt change
> > > > > and if I knew the base for this patch it would be rather easy to work
> > > > > out what has changed.
> > >
> > > 4.20-rc2
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, should we do an s/shmobile.txt/shmobile.yaml/ in MAINTAINERS?
> > >
> > > Yes. Though it was pointed out that get_maintainers.pl can pull emails
> > > out of this file. We'd need to get that to work by default though.
> > >
> > > > Probably even s/shmobile.yaml/renesas.yaml/, while at it?
> > >
> > > Sure, if that's what you all want.
> >
> > How about this?
> 
> LGTM

Thanks.

As my tree is already closed for v4.21 I have applied this for v4.22.


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list