[PATCH v8 5/5] powernv/pseries: consolidate code for mce early handling.

Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar mahesh at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Aug 27 20:32:26 AEST 2018


On 08/23/2018 02:32 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 14:13:13 +0530
> Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar <mahesh at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 08/20/2018 05:04 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>>> On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 22:38:39 +0530
>>> Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> From: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>
>>>> Now that other platforms also implements real mode mce handler,
>>>> lets consolidate the code by sharing existing powernv machine check
>>>> early code. Rename machine_check_powernv_early to
>>>> machine_check_common_early and reuse the code.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S |  155 ++++++----------------------------
>>>>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
>>>> index 12f056179112..2f85a7baf026 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
>>>> @@ -243,14 +243,13 @@ EXC_REAL_BEGIN(machine_check, 0x200, 0x100)
>>>>  	SET_SCRATCH0(r13)		/* save r13 */
>>>>  	EXCEPTION_PROLOG_0(PACA_EXMC)
>>>>  BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
>>>> -	b	machine_check_powernv_early
>>>> +	b	machine_check_common_early
>>>>  FTR_SECTION_ELSE
>>>>  	b	machine_check_pSeries_0
>>>>  ALT_FTR_SECTION_END_IFSET(CPU_FTR_HVMODE)
>>>>  EXC_REAL_END(machine_check, 0x200, 0x100)
>>>>  EXC_VIRT_NONE(0x4200, 0x100)
>>>> -TRAMP_REAL_BEGIN(machine_check_powernv_early)
>>>> -BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
>>>> +TRAMP_REAL_BEGIN(machine_check_common_early)
>>>>  	EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1(PACA_EXMC, NOTEST, 0x200)
>>>>  	/*
>>>>  	 * Register contents:
>>>> @@ -306,7 +305,9 @@ BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
>>>>  	/* Save r9 through r13 from EXMC save area to stack frame. */
>>>>  	EXCEPTION_PROLOG_COMMON_2(PACA_EXMC)
>>>>  	mfmsr	r11			/* get MSR value */
>>>> +BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
>>>>  	ori	r11,r11,MSR_ME		/* turn on ME bit */
>>>> +END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_HVMODE)
>>>>  	ori	r11,r11,MSR_RI		/* turn on RI bit */
>>>>  	LOAD_HANDLER(r12, machine_check_handle_early)
>>>>  1:	mtspr	SPRN_SRR0,r12
>>>> @@ -325,7 +326,6 @@ BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
>>>>  	andc	r11,r11,r10		/* Turn off MSR_ME */
>>>>  	b	1b
>>>>  	b	.	/* prevent speculative execution */
>>>> -END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_HVMODE)
>>>>  
>>>>  TRAMP_REAL_BEGIN(machine_check_pSeries)
>>>>  	.globl machine_check_fwnmi
>>>> @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ machine_check_fwnmi:
>>>>  	SET_SCRATCH0(r13)		/* save r13 */
>>>>  	EXCEPTION_PROLOG_0(PACA_EXMC)
>>>>  BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
>>>> -	b	machine_check_pSeries_early
>>>> +	b	machine_check_common_early
>>>>  END_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(CPU_FTR_HVMODE)
>>>>  machine_check_pSeries_0:
>>>>  	EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1(PACA_EXMC, KVMTEST_PR, 0x200)
>>>> @@ -346,103 +346,6 @@ machine_check_pSeries_0:
>>>>  
>>>>  TRAMP_KVM_SKIP(PACA_EXMC, 0x200)
>>>>  
>>>> -TRAMP_REAL_BEGIN(machine_check_pSeries_early)
>>>> -BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
>>>> -	EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1(PACA_EXMC, NOTEST, 0x200)
>>>> -	mr	r10,r1			/* Save r1 */
>>>> -	lhz	r11,PACA_IN_MCE(r13)
>>>> -	cmpwi	r11,0			/* Are we in nested machine check */
>>>> -	bne	0f			/* Yes, we are. */
>>>> -	/* First machine check entry */
>>>> -	ld	r1,PACAMCEMERGSP(r13)	/* Use MC emergency stack */
>>>> -0:	subi	r1,r1,INT_FRAME_SIZE	/* alloc stack frame */
>>>> -	addi	r11,r11,1		/* increment paca->in_mce */
>>>> -	sth	r11,PACA_IN_MCE(r13)
>>>> -	/* Limit nested MCE to level 4 to avoid stack overflow */
>>>> -	cmpwi	r11,MAX_MCE_DEPTH
>>>> -	bgt	1f			/* Check if we hit limit of 4 */
>>>> -	mfspr	r11,SPRN_SRR0		/* Save SRR0 */
>>>> -	mfspr	r12,SPRN_SRR1		/* Save SRR1 */
>>>> -	EXCEPTION_PROLOG_COMMON_1()
>>>> -	EXCEPTION_PROLOG_COMMON_2(PACA_EXMC)
>>>> -	EXCEPTION_PROLOG_COMMON_3(0x200)
>>>> -	addi	r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
>>>> -	BRANCH_LINK_TO_FAR(machine_check_early) /* Function call ABI */
>>>> -	ld	r12,_MSR(r1)
>>>> -	andi.	r11,r12,MSR_PR		/* See if coming from user. */
>>>> -	bne	2f			/* continue in V mode if we are. */
>>>> -
>>>> -	/*
>>>> -	 * At this point we are not sure about what context we come from.
>>>> -	 * We may be in the middle of swithing stack. r1 may not be valid.
>>>> -	 * Hence stay on emergency stack, call machine_check_exception and
>>>> -	 * return from the interrupt.
>>>> -	 * But before that, check if this is an un-recoverable exception.
>>>> -	 * If yes, then stay on emergency stack and panic.
>>>> -	 */
>>>> -	andi.	r11,r12,MSR_RI
>>>> -	beq	1f
>>>> -
>>>> -	/*
>>>> -	 * Check if we have successfully handled/recovered from error, if not
>>>> -	 * then stay on emergency stack and panic.
>>>> -	 */
>>>> -	cmpdi	r3,0		/* see if we handled MCE successfully */
>>>> -	beq	1f		/* if !handled then panic */
>>>> -
>>>> -	/* Stay on emergency stack and return from interrupt. */
>>>> -	LOAD_HANDLER(r10,mce_return)
>>>> -	mtspr	SPRN_SRR0,r10
>>>> -	ld	r10,PACAKMSR(r13)
>>>> -	mtspr	SPRN_SRR1,r10
>>>> -	RFI_TO_KERNEL
>>>> -	b	.
>>>> -
>>>> -1:	LOAD_HANDLER(r10,unrecover_mce)
>>>> -	mtspr	SPRN_SRR0,r10
>>>> -	ld	r10,PACAKMSR(r13)
>>>> -	/*
>>>> -	 * We are going down. But there are chances that we might get hit by
>>>> -	 * another MCE during panic path and we may run into unstable state
>>>> -	 * with no way out. Hence, turn ME bit off while going down, so that
>>>> -	 * when another MCE is hit during panic path, hypervisor will
>>>> -	 * power cycle the lpar, instead of getting into MCE loop.
>>>> -	 */
>>>> -	li	r3,MSR_ME
>>>> -	andc	r10,r10,r3		/* Turn off MSR_ME */
>>>> -	mtspr	SPRN_SRR1,r10
>>>> -	RFI_TO_KERNEL
>>>> -	b	.
>>>> -
>>>> -	/* Move original SRR0 and SRR1 into the respective regs */
>>>> -2:	ld	r9,_MSR(r1)
>>>> -	mtspr	SPRN_SRR1,r9
>>>> -	ld	r3,_NIP(r1)
>>>> -	mtspr	SPRN_SRR0,r3
>>>> -	ld	r9,_CTR(r1)
>>>> -	mtctr	r9
>>>> -	ld	r9,_XER(r1)
>>>> -	mtxer	r9
>>>> -	ld	r9,_LINK(r1)
>>>> -	mtlr	r9
>>>> -	REST_GPR(0, r1)
>>>> -	REST_8GPRS(2, r1)
>>>> -	REST_GPR(10, r1)
>>>> -	ld	r11,_CCR(r1)
>>>> -	mtcr	r11
>>>> -	/* Decrement paca->in_mce. */
>>>> -	lhz	r12,PACA_IN_MCE(r13)
>>>> -	subi	r12,r12,1
>>>> -	sth	r12,PACA_IN_MCE(r13)
>>>> -	REST_GPR(11, r1)
>>>> -	REST_2GPRS(12, r1)
>>>> -	/* restore original r1. */
>>>> -	ld	r1,GPR1(r1)
>>>> -	SET_SCRATCH0(r13)		/* save r13 */
>>>> -	EXCEPTION_PROLOG_0(PACA_EXMC)
>>>> -	b	machine_check_pSeries_0
>>>> -END_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(CPU_FTR_HVMODE)
>>>> -
>>>>  EXC_COMMON_BEGIN(machine_check_common)
>>>>  	/*
>>>>  	 * Machine check is different because we use a different
>>>> @@ -541,6 +444,9 @@ EXC_COMMON_BEGIN(machine_check_handle_early)
>>>>  	bl	machine_check_early
>>>>  	std	r3,RESULT(r1)	/* Save result */
>>>>  	ld	r12,_MSR(r1)
>>>> +BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
>>>> +	b	4f
>>>> +END_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(CPU_FTR_HVMODE)
>>>>  
>>>>  #ifdef	CONFIG_PPC_P7_NAP
>>>>  	/*
>>>> @@ -564,10 +470,11 @@ EXC_COMMON_BEGIN(machine_check_handle_early)
>>>>  	 */
>>>>  	rldicl.	r11,r12,4,63		/* See if MC hit while in HV mode. */
>>>>  	beq	5f
>>>> -	andi.	r11,r12,MSR_PR		/* See if coming from user. */
>>>> +4:	andi.	r11,r12,MSR_PR		/* See if coming from user. */
>>>>  	bne	9f			/* continue in V mode if we are. */
>>>>  
>>>>  5:
>>>> +BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
>>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_HANDLER
>>>>  	/*
>>>>  	 * We are coming from kernel context. Check if we are coming from
>>>> @@ -578,6 +485,7 @@ EXC_COMMON_BEGIN(machine_check_handle_early)
>>>>  	cmpwi	r11,0			/* Check if coming from guest */
>>>>  	bne	9f			/* continue if we are. */
>>>>  #endif
>>>> +END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_HVMODE)  
>>>
>>> Put these inside the ifdef?
>>>
>>>   
>>>>  	/*
>>>>  	 * At this point we are not sure about what context we come from.
>>>>  	 * Queue up the MCE event and return from the interrupt.
>>>> @@ -611,6 +519,7 @@ EXC_COMMON_BEGIN(machine_check_handle_early)
>>>>  	cmpdi	r3,0		/* see if we handled MCE successfully */
>>>>  
>>>>  	beq	1b		/* if !handled then panic */
>>>> +BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
>>>>  	/*
>>>>  	 * Return from MC interrupt.
>>>>  	 * Queue up the MCE event so that we can log it later, while
>>>> @@ -619,10 +528,24 @@ EXC_COMMON_BEGIN(machine_check_handle_early)
>>>>  	bl	machine_check_queue_event
>>>>  	MACHINE_CHECK_HANDLER_WINDUP
>>>>  	RFI_TO_USER_OR_KERNEL
>>>> +FTR_SECTION_ELSE
>>>> +	/*
>>>> +	 * pSeries: Return from MC interrupt. Before that stay on emergency
>>>> +	 * stack and call machine_check_exception to log the MCE event.
>>>> +	 */
>>>> +	LOAD_HANDLER(r10,mce_return)
>>>> +	mtspr	SPRN_SRR0,r10
>>>> +	ld	r10,PACAKMSR(r13)
>>>> +	mtspr	SPRN_SRR1,r10
>>>> +	RFI_TO_KERNEL
>>>> +	b	.
>>>> +ALT_FTR_SECTION_END_IFSET(CPU_FTR_HVMODE)  
>>>
>>> Do you still need mce_return? Why can't you consolidate it as well? ...
>>> Hmm, okay so now I look back at patch 2, I don't think you should call
>>> machine_check_exception there. You're supposed to call
>>> machine_check_queue_event here and it will be handled by irq work.  
>>
>> machine_check_queue_event does not handle RTAS mce event.
> 
> Yes it would need a bit of work.
> 
>> Also, we need
>> to call fwnmi_release_errinfo() as early as possible which is why I am
>> calling machine_check_exception() in mce_return path for pSeries.
>> Otherwise if we get another MCE before calling fwnmi_release_errinfo()
>> then lpar will get rebooted without any logs getting printed.
> 
> I think you can call that in your early handler, but then defer
> the printing to the irq work.
> 
> Although hmm, maybe that's less of a problem now we do nmi_enter
> in machine check exception so I think printk will use an NMI safe
> buffer.
> 
> We have to be careful actually of soft irq state if we take a
> machine check in an un-reconciled state or in the middle of
> the irq replay code I'm not actually sure we do the right thing,
> but that would be a bug in existing code too. And we definitely
> have MSR[RI] vs DAR/DSISR bugs in existing code, sigh.
> 
> I don't know... maybe just push what you have and we'll try to do
> some more fixes and cleanups on top of that.

Sure. I will respin the next version addressing your other minor
comments. Will work on more improvements as separate change.

Thanks,
-Mahesh.



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list