DT case sensitivity

[Segher Boessenkool]

On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:29:01AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 20:26 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 8:14 PM Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> > <benh at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 19:47 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > The default DT string handling in the kernel is node names and
> > > > compatibles are case insensitive and property names are case sensitive
> > > > (Sparc is the the only variation and is opposite). It seems only PPC
> > > > (and perhaps only Power Macs?) needs to support case insensitive
> > > > comparisons. It was probably a mistake to follow PPC for new arches
> > > > and we should have made everything case sensitive from the start. So I
> > > > have a few questions for the DT historians. :)
> > > 
> > > Open Firmware itself is insensitive.
> > 
> > Doesn't it depend on the implementation? Otherwise, how is Sparc different?
> 
> Not sure ...

The standard requires case-sensitive.

> Forth itself is insensitive for words

Not even.   http://forth.sourceforge.net/std/dpans/dpans3.htm#3.3.1.2

(Most non-ancient implementations are though).

> but maybe not for string comparisons.

Only COMPARE is standardised, and that is case-sensitive comparison.  Many
systems have other words to do case-insensitive comparisons, or words where
some runtime flag determines the case-sensitivity.

Btw.  A node name in Open Firmware is generically
  driver-name at unit-address:device-arguments
where driver-name is the part that is in the "name" property; this whole
case-sensitivity business is even worse for FDT, where you also treat the
unit address as part of the name.  In real Open Firmware the address is
compared *as a number* (or as a few numbers), so it is naturally case-
insensitive (it does not care if you write 01a0 or 01A0, or 1a0 or 000001a0
etc.)


Segher