[PATCH] lib/test_hexdump: fix failure on big endian cpu

Michael Ellerman mpe at ellerman.id.au
Thu Aug 9 16:18:04 AEST 2018


rashmica <rashmicy at gmail.com> writes:
> On 08/08/18 17:25, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at c-s.fr> writes:
>>> diff --git a/lib/test_hexdump.c b/lib/test_hexdump.c
>>> index 3f415d8101f3..626f580b4ff7 100644
>>> --- a/lib/test_hexdump.c
>>> +++ b/lib/test_hexdump.c
>>> @@ -32,16 +32,33 @@ static const char * const test_data_2_le[] __initconst = {
>>>  	"d14c", "9919", "b143", "0caf",
>>>  };
>>>  
>>> +static const char * const test_data_2_be[] __initconst = {
>>> +	"be32", "db7b", "0a18", "93b2",
>>> +	"70ba", "c424", "7d83", "349b",
>>> +	"a69c", "31ad", "9c0f", "ace9",
>>> +	"4cd1", "1999", "43b1", "af0c",
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>  static const char * const test_data_4_le[] __initconst = {
>>>  	"7bdb32be", "b293180a", "24c4ba70", "9b34837d",
>>>  	"ad319ca6", "e9ac0f9c", "9919d14c", "0cafb143",
>>>  };
>>>  
>>> +static const char * const test_data_4_be[] __initconst = {
>>> +	"be32db7b", "0a1893b2", "70bac424", "7d83349b",
>>> +	"a69c31ad", "9c0face9", "4cd11999", "43b1af0c",
>>> +};
>>> +
>> Is there a reason we can't do it all at compile time?
>
> mpe I sent a patch doing that awhile ago and you obviously didn't like
> it because you never merged it :P

Sorry, I wasn't sure who should merge it, and never followed up.

cheers


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list