[PATCH v1 1/1] misc: IBM Virtual Management Channel Driver
Randy Dunlap
rdunlap at infradead.org
Wed Apr 25 01:21:20 AEST 2018
On 04/24/2018 07:29 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 02:17:28PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 04/23/18 12:53, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:38:18AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>> On 04/23/18 07:46, Bryant G. Ly wrote:
>>>>> This driver is a logical device which provides an
>>>>> interface between the hypervisor and a management
>>>>> partition.
>>>>>
>>>>> This driver is to be used for the POWER Virtual
>>>>> Management Channel Virtual Adapter on the PowerVM
>>>>> platform. It provides both request/response and
>>>>> async message support through the /dev/ibmvmc node.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bryant G. Ly <bryantly at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Steven Royer <seroyer at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Adam Reznechek <adreznec at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>> Tested-by: Taylor Jakobson <tjakobs at us.ibm.com>
>>>>> Tested-by: Brad Warrum <bwarrum at us.ibm.com>
>>>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>
>>>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
>>>>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
>>>>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt | 1 +
>>>>> Documentation/misc-devices/ibmvmc.txt | 161 +++
>>>>> MAINTAINERS | 6 +
>>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/hvcall.h | 1 +
>>>>> drivers/misc/Kconfig | 14 +
>>>>> drivers/misc/Makefile | 1 +
>>>>> drivers/misc/ibmvmc.c | 2415 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> drivers/misc/ibmvmc.h | 209 +++
>>>>> 8 files changed, 2808 insertions(+)
>>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/misc-devices/ibmvmc.txt
>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/ibmvmc.c
>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/ibmvmc.h
>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/misc-devices/ibmvmc.txt b/Documentation/misc-devices/ibmvmc.txt
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 0000000..bae1064
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/misc-devices/ibmvmc.txt
>>>
>>> Aren't we doing new documentation in .rst format instead of .txt?
>>
>> I am not aware that .rst format is a *requirement* for new documentation.
>>
>> ??
>
> Why wouldn't you create new documentation in that format? Just saves
> the step of having to change it again in the future.
Not everything needs to be in that format.
If a document contains graphics or lots of tables, then sure, use RST.
Do you do kernel Documentation builds yourself? Do you know how slow they are?
--
~Randy
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list