[PATCH 5/6] powerpc/powernv: implement opal_put_chars_nonatomic

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 16:23 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 15:57:55 +1000
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 15:40 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > > The RAW console does not need writes to be atomic, so implement a
> > > _nonatomic variant which does not take a spinlock. This API is used
> > > in xmon, so the less locking thta's used, the better chance there is
> > > that a crash can be debugged.  
> > 
> > I find the term "nonatomic" confusing...
> 
> I guess it is to go with the "atomic" comment for the hvsi console
> case -- all characters must get to the console together or not at
> all.

Yeah ok, it's just that in Linux "atomic" usually means something else
:-) Why not just call it "unlocked" which is what it's about and
matches existing practices thorough the kernel ?

> > don't we have a problem if we
> > start hitting OPAL without a lock where we can't trust
> > opal_console_write_buffer_space anymore ? I think we need to handle
> > partial writes in that case. Maybe we should return how much was
> > written and leave the caller to deal with it.
> 
> Yes, the _nonatomic variant doesn't use opal_console_write_buffer_space
> and it does handle partial writes by returning written bytes (although
> callers generally tend to loop at the moment, we might do something
> smarter with them later).
> 
> > I was hoping (but that isn't the case) that by nonatomic you actually
> > meant calls that could be done in a non-atomic context, where we can do
> > msleep instead of mdelay. That would be handy for the console coming
> > from the hvc thread (the tty one).
> 
> Ah right, no. However we no longer loop until everything is written, so
> the hvc console driver (or the console layer) should be able to deal with
> that with sleeping. I don't think we need to put it at this level of the
> driver, but I don't know much about the console code.

Ok, so hopefully we shouldn't be hitting the delay..

Cheers,
Ben.