[PATCH] powerpc/eeh: Disable EEH stack dump by default

joserz at linux.vnet.ibm.com joserz at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Sep 21 03:55:17 AEST 2017


On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 02:47:08PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Jose Ricardo Ziviani <joserz at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> 
> > Today, each EEH causes a stack dump to be printed in the logs. In
> > production environment it's not quite necessary. Thus, this patch
> 
> I'm unconvinced. A production environment is exactly where you don't
> want to be getting an EEH, and so if you *do* then every bit of
> information is helpful.
> 
> > For example, instead of the following:
> >
> > [  131.778661] EEH: Frozen PHB#2-PE#fd detected
> > [  131.778672] EEH: PE location: N/A, PHB location: N/A
> > [  131.778677] CPU: 21 PID: 10098 Comm: lspci Not tainted ...
> > [  131.778680] Call Trace:
> > [  131.778686] [c0000003a140bab0] [c000000000beb58c] dump_stack+...
> > <snip ~10 lines>
> > [  131.778770] EEH: Detected PCI bus error on PHB#2-PE#fd
> > [  131.778775] EEH: This PCI device has failed 1 times in the last hour
> > ...
> >
> > we will have this by default:
> >
> > [12777.175880] EEH: Frozen PHB#2-PE#fd detected
> > [12777.175893] EEH: PE location: N/A, PHB location: N/A
> > [12777.175922] EEH: Detected PCI bus error on PHB#2-PE#fd
> > [12777.175931] EEH: This PCI device has failed 2 times in the last hour
> 
> *What* PCI device?
> 
> How am I supposed to know what device/driver just failed? If I had the
> stack trace I could probably at least work it out based on the driver
> involved.
> 
> cheers
> 

Thank you guys! More people told me it's important to keep it as is.
Please, disregard this patch.



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list