[v4 01/11] soc/fsl/qbman: Use shared-dma-pool for BMan private memory allocations

[Catalin Marinas]

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:37:45PM -0400, Roy Pledge wrote:
> --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/bman_ccsr.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/bman_ccsr.c
[...]
> @@ -201,6 +202,38 @@ static int fsl_bman_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If FBPR memory wasn't defined using the qbman compatible string
> +	 * try using the of_reserved_mem_device method
> +	 */
> +	if (!fbpr_a) {
> +		ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init(dev);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "of_reserved_mem_device_init() failed 0x%x\n",
> +				ret);
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +		}
> +		mem_node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "memory-region", 0);
> +		if (mem_node) {
> +			ret = of_property_read_u64(mem_node, "size", &size);
> +			if (ret) {
> +				dev_err(dev, "FBPR: of_address_to_resource fails 0x%x\n",
> +					ret);
> +				return -ENODEV;
> +			}
> +			fbpr_sz = size;
> +		} else {
> +			dev_err(dev, "No memory-region found for FBPR\n");
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +		}
> +		if (!dma_zalloc_coherent(dev, fbpr_sz, &fbpr_a, 0)) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "Alloc FBPR memory failed\n");
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +		}
> +	}

At a quick look, I think I spotted this pattern a couple of more times
in the subsequent patch. Could it be moved to a common function?

-- 
Catalin