[PATCH kernel] vfio/spapr: Add trace points for map/unmap

Alex Williamson alex.williamson at redhat.com
Thu Nov 30 03:32:44 AEDT 2017


On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:13:37 +1100
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru> wrote:

> On 17/11/17 17:58, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > On 17/11/17 11:13, Alex Williamson wrote:  
> >> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 10:47:12 +1100
> >> Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru> wrote:
> >>  
> >>> On 27/10/17 14:00, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:  
> >>>> This adds trace_map/trace_unmap tracepoints to spapr driver. Type1 already
> >>>> uses these via the IOMMU API (iommu_map/__iommu_unmap).
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru>    
> >>
> >> Is this really legitimate to include tracepoints from a different  
> >> subsystem?>  The vfio type1 backend gets these trace points by virtue of  
> >> it actually using the IOMMU API, it doesn't call them itself.  I'm kind
> >> of surprised these are actually available to be called from a module.  
> > 
> > They are explicitly exported:
> > 
> > EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(map);
> > EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(unmap);
> > 
> > I would think this is for things like drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c ,
> > why else?...
> > 
> >   
> >> I suspect the way to do this is probably to define our own tracepoints
> >> in the vfio/spapr backend or insert tracepoints into the IOMMU layers
> >> that that code calls into rather than masquerading as tracepoints from
> >> a different subsystem.  Right?  
> > 
> > This makes sense too. But it is going to be just cut-n-paste and some
> > confusion -
> > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/iommu/map will still be present but
> > won't work and
> > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce/map will.

But iommu/map does work, it's just not called by the vfio spapr tce
backend, which is absolutely correct.  In fact, that's part of my
reservation about this approach is that it could be interpreted as
implying a call path that doesn't exist on this arch.

> > Judges? :)  
> 
> 
> Still nak? I discussed this locally, the conclusion was it is a matter of
> taste and this proposal is not that disgusting. Thanks.

Is that our goal now, proposals that aren't too disgusting?  I think
it's an opportunity to introduce our own tracing infrastructure and it
feels a lot more correct to do that than to generalize existing trace
points from other subsystems.  Thanks,

Alex


> >>>> ---
> >>>>
> >>>> Example:
> >>>>  qemu-system-ppc-8655  [096]   724.662740: unmap:                IOMMU: iova=0x000000003ffff000 size=4096 unmapped_size=4096
> >>>>  qemu-system-ppc-8656  [104]   724.970912: map:                  IOMMU: iova=0x0800000000000000 paddr=0x00007ffef7ff0000 size=65536
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> >>>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
> >>>> index 63112c36ab2d..4531486c77c6 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
> >>>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> >>>>  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> >>>>  #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
> >>>>  #include <linux/sched/signal.h>
> >>>> +#include <trace/events/iommu.h>
> >>>>  
> >>>>  #include <asm/iommu.h>
> >>>>  #include <asm/tce.h>
> >>>> @@ -502,17 +503,19 @@ static int tce_iommu_clear(struct tce_container *container,
> >>>>  		struct iommu_table *tbl,
> >>>>  		unsigned long entry, unsigned long pages)
> >>>>  {
> >>>> -	unsigned long oldhpa;
> >>>> +	unsigned long oldhpa, unmapped, firstentry = entry, totalpages = pages;
> >>>>  	long ret;
> >>>>  	enum dma_data_direction direction;
> >>>>  
> >>>> -	for ( ; pages; --pages, ++entry) {
> >>>> +	for (unmapped = 0; pages; --pages, ++entry) {
> >>>>  		direction = DMA_NONE;
> >>>>  		oldhpa = 0;
> >>>>  		ret = iommu_tce_xchg(tbl, entry, &oldhpa, &direction);
> >>>>  		if (ret)
> >>>>  			continue;
> >>>>  
> >>>> +		++unmapped;
> >>>> +
> >>>>  		if (direction == DMA_NONE)
> >>>>  			continue;
> >>>>  
> >>>> @@ -523,6 +526,9 @@ static int tce_iommu_clear(struct tce_container *container,
> >>>>  
> >>>>  		tce_iommu_unuse_page(container, oldhpa);
> >>>>  	}
> >>>> +	trace_unmap(firstentry << tbl->it_page_shift,
> >>>> +			totalpages << tbl->it_page_shift,
> >>>> +			unmapped << tbl->it_page_shift);
> >>>>  
> >>>>  	return 0;
> >>>>  }
> >>>> @@ -965,6 +971,8 @@ static long tce_iommu_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
> >>>>  					direction);
> >>>>  
> >>>>  		iommu_flush_tce(tbl);
> >>>> +		if (!ret)
> >>>> +			trace_map(param.iova, param.vaddr, param.size);
> >>>>  
> >>>>  		return ret;
> >>>>  	}
> >>>>     
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>  
> > 
> >   
> 
> 



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list