[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 0/7] [RESEND] [net] intel: Use smp_rmb rather than read_barrier_depends

Jesse Brandeburg jesse.brandeburg at intel.com
Fri Nov 17 09:01:12 AEDT 2017


On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 14:03:02 -0600
Brian King <brking at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> I did think about changing the powerpc definition of read_barrier_depends,
> but after reading up on that barrier, decided it was not the correct barrier
> to be used in this context. Here is some good historical background on
> read_barrier_depends that I found, along with an example.
> 
> https://lwn.net/Articles/5159/
> 
> Since there is no data-dependency in the code in question here, I think
> the smp_rmb is the proper barrier to use.

Hey Brian, thanks for the explanation, I'll agree with you and Alex
that the smb_rmb replacement is okay.  Does your test still pass
without the ->skb NULLs?


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list