[PATCH 2/9] timers: provide a "modern" variant of timers
Christoph Hellwig
hch at lst.de
Sun May 21 17:00:17 AEST 2017
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:57:31AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> How expensive would it be to add another field to timer_list and
> just have both pointers?
That would add 4/8 bytes to every structure containing a timer,
so I'd rather avoid it if possible. But one option might be to
inflict this onto users of outdated compilers and use the union
for modern ones.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list