Build failure -- powerpc/boot: Add OPAL console to epapr wrappers
Oliver O'Halloran
oohall at gmail.com
Sat Mar 25 13:16:33 AEDT 2017
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 4:00 AM, Daniel Walker <danielwa at cisco.com> wrote:
> I get this build failure,
>
>
> In file included from arch/powerpc/boot/fdt.c:51:
> ../arch/powerpc/boot/libfdt_env.h:9: error: redefinition of typedef
> 'uint32_t'
> ../arch/powerpc/boot/types.h:20: note: previous declaration of 'uint32_t'
> was here
> ../arch/powerpc/boot/libfdt_env.h:10: error: redefinition of typedef
> 'uint64_t'
> ../arch/powerpc/boot/types.h:21: note: previous declaration of 'uint64_t'
> was here
> make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/boot/fdt.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [uImage] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/nobackup/danielwa/linux/t1040'
> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
>
>
> and it bisects to ,
>
>
> commit 656ad58ef19e2a763fa5c938b20ae0f6b8d67242
> Author: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall at gmail.com>
> Date: Fri Jul 1 00:34:37 2016 +1000
>
> powerpc/boot: Add OPAL console to epapr wrappers
>
> This patch adds an OPAL console backend to the powerpc boot wrapper so
> that decompression failures inside the wrapper can be reported to the
> user. This is important since it typically indicates data corruption in
> the firmware and other nasty things.
>
> Currently this only works when building a little endian kernel. When
> compiling a 64 bit BE kernel the wrapper is always build 32 bit to be
> compatible with some 32 bit firmwares. BE support will be added at a
> later date. Another limitation of this is that only the "raw" type of
> OPAL console is supported, however machines that provide a hvsi console
> also provide a raw console so this is not an issue in practice.
>
> Actually-written-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall at gmail.com>
> [mpe: Move #ifdef __powerpc64__ to avoid warnings on 32-bit]
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au>
>
>
> I can provide a config file if needed. My apologies if this was already
> reported.
Thanks for the report, I don't think this is a known bug. mpe's build
testing is pretty thorough so I'm surprised this wasn't caught sooner.
A config file and the version of gcc that you're using would be useful.
Oliver
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list