[PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc: split ftrace bits into a separate file
Steven Rostedt
rostedt at goodmis.org
Sat Mar 11 03:54:45 AEDT 2017
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:38:53 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 2017/03/10 10:45AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Mar 2017 20:38:53 +1100
> > Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> > > So if we drop that we're left with ftrace.S - which seems perfect to me.
> >
> > Yeah, I agree. But then there's the problem that ftrace.c and ftrace.S
> > will get the same ftrace.o. Maybe make it ftrace-hook.S ?
>
> I've avoided that issue by naming the files ftrace_32.S and ftrace_64.S
> (which gets further split up).
That's what I looked at doing for x86 as well. But not all archs have
32 / 64 splits. Should we look to have something that all archs can be
consistent with?
-- Steve
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list