[PATCH v4 5/7] powerpc/64s: Un-blacklist system_call() from kprobes

[Nicholas Piggin]

On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:11:08 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> It is actually safe to probe system_call() in entry_64.S, but only till
> we unset MSR_RI. To allow this, add a new symbol system_call_exit()
> after the mtmsrd and blacklist that. Though the mtmsrd instruction
> itself is now whitelisted, we won't be allowed to probe on it as we
> don't allow probing on rfi and mtmsr instructions (checked for in
> arch_prepare_kprobe()).

Can you perhaps add a small comment to explain the label
(and why it's safe to have after the mtmsrd). It could be
a bit confusing to read if you don't have that detail of
the tracer in your mind.

Other than that

Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com>


> 
> Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> index c39436706555..7a87427a67cd 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
> @@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ system_call:			/* label this so stack traces look sane */
>  	mtmsrd	r11,1
>  #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E */
>  
> +system_call_exit:
>  	ld	r9,TI_FLAGS(r12)
>  	li	r11,-MAX_ERRNO
>  	andi.	r0,r9,(_TIF_SYSCALL_DOTRACE|_TIF_SINGLESTEP|_TIF_USER_WORK_MASK|_TIF_PERSYSCALL_MASK)
> @@ -413,7 +414,7 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_HAS_PPR)
>  	b	.	/* prevent speculative execution */
>  #endif
>  _ASM_NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(system_call_common);
> -_ASM_NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(system_call);
> +_ASM_NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(system_call_exit);
>  
>  /* Save non-volatile GPRs, if not already saved. */
>  _GLOBAL(save_nvgprs)