[PATCH v4 1/7] powerpc64/elfv1: Only dereference function descriptor for non-text symbols

Nicholas Piggin npiggin at gmail.com
Thu Jun 29 20:49:45 AEST 2017


On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:11:04 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Currently, we assume that the function pointer we receive in
> ppc_function_entry() points to a function descriptor. However, this is
> not always the case. In particular, assembly symbols without the right
> annotation do not have an associated function descriptor. Some of these
> symbols are added to the kprobe blacklist using _ASM_NOKPROBE_SYMBOL().
> 
> When such addresses are subsequently processed through
> arch_deref_entry_point() in populate_kprobe_blacklist(), we see the
> below errors during bootup:
>     [    0.663963] Failed to find blacklist at 7d9b02a648029b6c
>     [    0.663970] Failed to find blacklist at a14d03d0394a0001
>     [    0.663972] Failed to find blacklist at 7d5302a6f94d0388
>     [    0.663973] Failed to find blacklist at 48027d11e8610178
>     [    0.663974] Failed to find blacklist at f8010070f8410080
>     [    0.663976] Failed to find blacklist at 386100704801f89d
>     [    0.663977] Failed to find blacklist at 7d5302a6f94d00b0
> 
> Fix this by checking if the function pointer we receive in
> ppc_function_entry() already points to kernel text. If so, we just
> return it as is. If not, we assume that this is a function descriptor
> and proceed to dereference it.
> 
> Suggested-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h
> index abef812de7f8..5482928eea1b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h
> @@ -83,8 +83,16 @@ static inline unsigned long ppc_function_entry(void *func)
>  	 * On PPC64 ABIv1 the function pointer actually points to the
>  	 * function's descriptor. The first entry in the descriptor is the
>  	 * address of the function text.
> +	 *
> +	 * However, we may also receive pointer to an assembly symbol. To
> +	 * detect that, we first check if the function pointer we receive
> +	 * already points to kernel/module text and we only dereference it
> +	 * if it doesn't.
>  	 */
> -	return ((func_descr_t *)func)->entry;
> +	if (kernel_text_address((unsigned long)func))
> +		return (unsigned long)func;
> +	else
> +		return ((func_descr_t *)func)->entry;

This seems good to me now. I guess it should do the right thing with
modules too, looking at kernel_text_address implementation.

Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com>


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list