[PATCH v2 1/5] binfmt_elf: Use ELF_ET_DYN_BASE only for PIE

Kees Cook keescook at chromium.org
Sun Jun 25 05:16:42 AEST 2017


On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> wrote:
> For 32-bit tasks when RLIMIT_STACK is set to RLIM_INFINITY, programs
> are loaded below the mmap region. This means they can be made to collide
> (CVE-2017-1000370) or nearly collide (CVE-2017-1000371) with pathological
> stack regions. Lowering ELF_ET_DYN_BASE solves both by moving programs
> above the mmap region in all cases, and will now additionally avoid
> programs falling back to the mmap region by enforcing MAP_FIXED for
> program loads (i.e. if it would have collided with the stack, now it
> will fail to load instead of falling back to the mmap region).

It was pointed out by rmk that I described this inaccurately. I mix up
my own visualization of the address space (above/below in
/proc/$pid/maps) with actual value comparisons (above/below
numerically). This paragraph should read:


For 32-bit tasks when RLIMIT_STACK is set to RLIM_INFINITY, programs
are loaded above the mmap region. This means they can be made to collide
(CVE-2017-1000370) or nearly collide (CVE-2017-1000371) with pathological
stack regions. Lowering ELF_ET_DYN_BASE solves both by moving programs
below the mmap region in all cases, and will now additionally avoid
programs falling back to the mmap region by enforcing MAP_FIXED for
program loads (i.e. if it would have collided with the stack, now it
will fail to load instead of falling back to the mmap region).


Andrew, are you able to manually adjust this commit log in -mm, or
should I resend the patch with this paragraph corrected?

Thanks!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list