DNS (?) not working on G5 (64-bit powerpc) (was [net-next, v3, 3/3] udp: try to avoid 2 cache miss on dequeue)
Michael Ellerman
mpe at ellerman.id.au
Fri Jun 23 16:59:06 AEST 2017
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes at stressinduktion.org> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017, at 22:57, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>>
>> Can you please check if the following patch fixes the issue? Only
>> compiled tested here.
>>
>> Thanks!!!
>> ---
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
>> index 067a607..80d89fe 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
>> @@ -1446,16 +1446,19 @@ static struct sk_buff
>> *__first_packet_length(struct sock *sk,
>> {
>> struct sk_buff *skb;
>>
>> - while ((skb = skb_peek(rcvq)) != NULL &&
>> - udp_lib_checksum_complete(skb)) {
>> - __UDP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), UDP_MIB_CSUMERRORS,
>> - IS_UDPLITE(sk));
>> - __UDP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), UDP_MIB_INERRORS,
>> - IS_UDPLITE(sk));
>> - atomic_inc(&sk->sk_drops);
>> - __skb_unlink(skb, rcvq);
>> - *total += skb->truesize;
>> - kfree_skb(skb);
>> + while ((skb = skb_peek(rcvq)) != NULL) {
>> + if (udp_lib_checksum_complete(skb)) {
>> + __UDP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), UDP_MIB_CSUMERRORS,
>> + IS_UDPLITE(sk));
>> + __UDP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), UDP_MIB_INERRORS,
>> + IS_UDPLITE(sk));
>> + atomic_inc(&sk->sk_drops);
>> + __skb_unlink(skb, rcvq);
>> + *total += skb->truesize;
>> + kfree_skb(skb);
>> + } else {
>> + udp_set_dev_scratch(skb);
>
> It needs a "break;" here.
>
>> + }
>> }
>> return skb;
>> }
That works!
$ wget google.com
--2017-06-23 16:56:31-- http://google.com/
Resolving proxy.pmdw.com (proxy.pmdw.com)... 10.1.2.3
Connecting to proxy.pmdw.com (proxy.pmdw.com)|10.1.2.3|:3128... connected.
Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found
Location: http://www.google.com.au/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=n7tMWeb9JYPr8wfg4LXYAQ [following]
--2017-06-23 16:56:31-- http://www.google.com.au/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=n7tMWeb9JYPr8wfg4LXYAQ
Reusing existing connection to proxy.pmdw.com:3128.
Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: unspecified [text/html]
Saving to: ‘index.html’
The patch had whitespace issues or something and I had to apply it by
hand, here's what I actually tested.
cheers
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index 067a607917f9..d3227c1bbe8e 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -1446,16 +1446,20 @@ static struct sk_buff *__first_packet_length(struct sock *sk,
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
- while ((skb = skb_peek(rcvq)) != NULL &&
- udp_lib_checksum_complete(skb)) {
- __UDP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), UDP_MIB_CSUMERRORS,
- IS_UDPLITE(sk));
- __UDP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), UDP_MIB_INERRORS,
- IS_UDPLITE(sk));
- atomic_inc(&sk->sk_drops);
- __skb_unlink(skb, rcvq);
- *total += skb->truesize;
- kfree_skb(skb);
+ while ((skb = skb_peek(rcvq)) != NULL) {
+ if (udp_lib_checksum_complete(skb)) {
+ __UDP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), UDP_MIB_CSUMERRORS,
+ IS_UDPLITE(sk));
+ __UDP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), UDP_MIB_INERRORS,
+ IS_UDPLITE(sk));
+ atomic_inc(&sk->sk_drops);
+ __skb_unlink(skb, rcvq);
+ *total += skb->truesize;
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ } else {
+ udp_set_dev_scratch(skb);
+ break;
+ }
}
return skb;
}
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list