[PATCH 07/24] powerpc/mm: Move out definition of CPU specific is_write bits

LEROY Christophe christophe.leroy at c-s.fr
Sun Jul 23 02:40:58 AEST 2017


Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org> a écrit :

> Define a common page_fault_is_write() helper and use it
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> index f257965b54b5..26ec0dd4f419 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
> @@ -183,6 +183,16 @@ static int mm_fault_error(struct pt_regs *regs,  
> unsigned long addr, int fault)
>  }
>
>  /*
> + * Define the correct "is_write" bit in error_code based
> + * on the processor family
> + */
> +#if (defined(CONFIG_4xx) || defined(CONFIG_BOOKE))
> +#define page_fault_is_write(__err)	((__err) & ESR_DST)
> +#else
> +#define page_fault_is_write(__err)	((__err) & DSISR_ISSTORE)
> +#endif

Doesn't linux kernel codying style make preference to static inline  
functions instead of macros ?

> +
> +/*
>   * For 600- and 800-family processors, the error_code parameter is DSISR
>   * for a data fault, SRR1 for an instruction fault. For 400-family  
> processors
>   * the error_code parameter is ESR for a data fault, 0 for an instruction
> @@ -202,18 +212,12 @@ static int __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs  
> *regs, unsigned long address,
>  	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
>  	unsigned int flags = FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY | FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE;
>  	int code = SEGV_MAPERR;
> -	int is_write = 0;
>   	int is_exec = TRAP(regs) == 0x400;
>  	int is_user = user_mode(regs);
> +	int is_write = page_fault_is_write(error_code);
>  	int fault;
>  	int rc = 0, store_update_sp = 0;
>
> -#if !(defined(CONFIG_4xx) || defined(CONFIG_BOOKE))
> -	is_write = error_code & DSISR_ISSTORE;
> -#else
> -	is_write = error_code & ESR_DST;
> -#endif /* CONFIG_4xx || CONFIG_BOOKE */
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_ICSWX
>  	/*
>  	 * we need to do this early because this "data storage
> --
> 2.13.3




More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list