[RFC PATCH 01/11] powerpc/powernv: powernv platform is not constrained by RMA
Nicholas Piggin
npiggin at gmail.com
Sat Jul 22 11:17:31 AEST 2017
Remove incorrect comment about real mode address restrictions on
powernv (bare metal), and unnecessary clamping to ppc64_rma_size.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
index 9b87abb178f0..bcdca4144362 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
@@ -162,12 +162,9 @@ int __init early_init_dt_scan_recoverable_ranges(unsigned long node,
sizeof(struct mcheck_recoverable_range);
/*
- * Allocate a buffer to hold the MC recoverable ranges. We would be
- * accessing them in real mode, hence it needs to be within
- * RMO region.
+ * Allocate a buffer to hold the MC recoverable ranges.
*/
- mc_recoverable_range =__va(memblock_alloc_base(size, __alignof__(u64),
- ppc64_rma_size));
+ mc_recoverable_range =__va(memblock_alloc(size, __alignof__(u64)));
memset(mc_recoverable_range, 0, size);
for (i = 0; i < mc_recoverable_range_len; i++) {
--
2.11.0
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list