[PATCH V2 0/6] Enable NX 842 compression engine on Power9

[Nicholas Piggin]

On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:43:19 -0700
Haren Myneni <haren at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> [PATCH V2 0/6] Enable NX 842 compression engine on Power9
> 
> P9 introduces Virtual Accelerator Switchboard (VAS) to communicate
> with NX 842 engine. icswx function is used to access NX before.
> On powerNV systems, NX-842 driver invokes VAS functions for
> configuring RxFIFO (receive window) per each NX engine. VAS uses
> this FIFO to communicate the request to NX. The kernel opens send
> window which is used to transfer compression/decompression requests
> to VAS. It maps the send window to the corresponding RxFIFO.
> copy/paste instructions are used to pass the CRB to VAS.
> 
> This patch series adds P9 NX support for 842 compression engine.
> First 4 patches reorganize the current code so that VAS function
> can be added.
> - nx842_powernv_function points to VAS function if VAS feature is
>   available. Otherwise icswx function is used.
> - Move configure CRB code nx842_cfg_crb() 
> - In addition to freeing co-processor structs for initialization 
>   failures and exit, both send and receive windows have to closed
>   for VAS.
> - Move updating coprocessor info list to nx842_add_coprocs_list().
> 
> The last 2 patches adds configuring and invoking VAS, and also
> checking P9 NX specific errors that are provided in co-processor
> status block (CSB) for failures.
> 
> Patches have been tested on P9 DD1 system using VAS changes and
> on P8 HW to make sure no regression.
> 
> This patchset depends on VAS kernel changes:
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2017-May/158178.html

Just a question, we no longer invalidate the copy buffer on context
switch after this patch:

07d2a628bc ("powerpc/64s: Avoid cpabort in context switch when possible")

If your vas address mappings are visible only to kernel, only used in
process / kthread context, and only used with kernel preemption disabled,
this is okay.

If userspace can possibly copy/paste to the mappings or if you need to
sleep or call this from interrupt context, we need to work out how to
invalidate the copy buffer.

Thanks,
Nick