[RFC v5 12/38] mm: ability to disable execute permission on a key at creation
dave.hansen at intel.com
Wed Jul 12 07:57:30 AEST 2017
On 07/11/2017 02:51 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 07:29:37AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 11:11 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>> On 07/05/2017 02:21 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
>>>> Currently sys_pkey_create() provides the ability to disable read
>>>> and write permission on the key, at creation. powerpc has the
>>>> hardware support to disable execute on a pkey as well.This patch
>>>> enhances the interface to let disable execute at key creation
>>>> time. x86 does not allow this. Hence the next patch will add
>>>> ability in x86 to return error if PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE is
>> That leads to the question... How do you tell userspace.
>> (apologies if I missed that in an existing patch in the series)
>> How do we inform userspace of the key capabilities ? There are at least
>> two things userspace may want to know already:
>> - What protection bits are supported for a key
> the userspace is the one which allocates the keys and enables/disables the
> protection bits on the key. the kernel is just a facilitator. Now if the
> use space wants to know the current permissions on a given key, it can
> just read the AMR/PKRU register on powerpc/intel respectively.
Let's say I want to execute-disable a region. Can I use protection
keys? Do I do
and assume that the -EINVAL is because PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE is
unsupported, or do I do:
pkey = pkey_aloc();
>> - How many keys exist
> There is no standard way of finding this other than trying to allocate
> as many till you fail. A procfs or sysfs file can be added to expose
> this information.
It's also dynamic. On x86, you lose a key if you've used the
execute-only support. We also reserve the right to steal more in the
future if we want.
>> - Which keys are available for use by userspace. On PowerPC, the
>> kernel can reserve some keys for itself, so can the hypervisor. In
>> fact, they do.
> this information can be exposed through /proc or /sysfs
> I am sure there will be more demands and requirements as applications
> start leveraging these feature.
For 5 bits, I think just having someone run pkey_alloc() in a loop is
fine. I don't think we really need to enumerate it in some other way.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev