[RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys

Ram Pai linuxram at us.ibm.com
Tue Jul 11 03:15:36 AEST 2017

On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 11:05:44PM -0700, Ram Pai wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:13:23AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > On 07/06/2017 02:51 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
> > do you have data points to show the difference in
> > performance between this version and the last one where
> > we skipped the bits from PTE and directly programmed the
> > HPTE entries looking into VMA bits.
> No. I dont. I am hoping you can help me out with this.
	The last version where we skipped the PTE bits is guaranteed
	to be bad/horrible. For one it has a bug, since it accesses
	the vma without a lock. And even if we did take a lock, it
	will slow down the page-hash path un-acceptably. So there is
	no point measuring the performance of that design.

	I think the number we want to measure is -- the performance 
	with the current design and comparing that to the performance
	without memkey feature. We want to find if there is
	any degradation by adding this feature.


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list