[RFC v5 38/38] Documentation: PowerPC specific updates to memory protection keys
Anshuman Khandual
khandual at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Jul 10 13:07:04 AEST 2017
On 07/06/2017 02:52 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
> Add documentation updates that capture PowerPC specific changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram at us.ibm.com>
> ---
> Documentation/vm/protection-keys.txt | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/vm/protection-keys.txt b/Documentation/vm/protection-keys.txt
> index b643045..d50b6ab 100644
> --- a/Documentation/vm/protection-keys.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/vm/protection-keys.txt
> @@ -1,21 +1,46 @@
> -Memory Protection Keys for Userspace (PKU aka PKEYs) is a CPU feature
> -which will be found on future Intel CPUs.
> +Memory Protection Keys for Userspace (PKU aka PKEYs) is a CPU feature found in
> +new generation of intel CPUs and on PowerPC 7 and higher CPUs.
>
> Memory Protection Keys provides a mechanism for enforcing page-based
> -protections, but without requiring modification of the page tables
> -when an application changes protection domains. It works by
> -dedicating 4 previously ignored bits in each page table entry to a
> -"protection key", giving 16 possible keys.
> -
> -There is also a new user-accessible register (PKRU) with two separate
> -bits (Access Disable and Write Disable) for each key. Being a CPU
> -register, PKRU is inherently thread-local, potentially giving each
> -thread a different set of protections from every other thread.
> -
> -There are two new instructions (RDPKRU/WRPKRU) for reading and writing
> -to the new register. The feature is only available in 64-bit mode,
> -even though there is theoretically space in the PAE PTEs. These
> -permissions are enforced on data access only and have no effect on
> +protections, but without requiring modification of the page tables when an
> +application changes protection domains.
> +
> +
> +On Intel:
> +
> + It works by dedicating 4 previously ignored bits in each page table
> + entry to a "protection key", giving 16 possible keys.
> +
> + There is also a new user-accessible register (PKRU) with two separate
> + bits (Access Disable and Write Disable) for each key. Being a CPU
> + register, PKRU is inherently thread-local, potentially giving each
> + thread a different set of protections from every other thread.
> +
> + There are two new instructions (RDPKRU/WRPKRU) for reading and writing
> + to the new register. The feature is only available in 64-bit mode,
> + even though there is theoretically space in the PAE PTEs. These
> + permissions are enforced on data access only and have no effect on
> + instruction fetches.
> +
> +
> +On PowerPC:
> +
> + It works by dedicating 5 page table entry bits to a "protection key",
> + giving 32 possible keys.
> +
> + There is a user-accessible register (AMR) with two separate bits;
> + Access Disable and Write Disable, for each key. Being a CPU
> + register, AMR is inherently thread-local, potentially giving each
> + thread a different set of protections from every other thread. NOTE:
> + Disabling read permission does not disable write and vice-versa.
We can only enable/disable entire access or write. Then how
read permission can be changed with protection keys directly ?
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list