[PATCH 5/5] mtd: powernv_flash: Use opal_async_wait_response_interruptible()
Cyril Bur
cyrilbur at gmail.com
Mon Jul 10 09:58:50 AEST 2017
On Sat, 2017-07-08 at 14:59 -0500, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 16:54 +1000, Cyril Bur wrote:
> > The OPAL calls performed in this driver shouldn't be using
> > opal_async_wait_response() as this performs a wait_event() which, on
> > long running OPAL calls could result in hung task warnings. wait_event()
> > also prevents timely signal delivery which is also undesirable.
> >
> > This patch also attempts to quieten down the use of dev_err() when
> > errors haven't actually occurred and also to return better information up
> > the stack rather than always -EIO.
>
> So what happens when you get a signal then ? The async op is still in
> progress, will the callers properly handle that ?
>
> For example, for a read, OPAL will potentially still be writing to
> the destination buffer. Are the callers expecting this ?
>
> That sounds very broken to me ....
>
Correct - I have a v2 that I let stew in my head over the weekend
before sending. I think its good.
Thanks,
Cyril
> You should simply limit the amount of flash that can be affected by
> a single call to avoid long hung tasks.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mtd/devices/powernv_flash.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/powernv_flash.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/powernv_flash.c
> > index 7b41af06f4fe..a7c5ae2b2898 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/powernv_flash.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/powernv_flash.c
> > @@ -88,19 +88,23 @@ static int powernv_flash_async_op(struct mtd_info *mtd, enum flash_op op,
> > }
> >
> > if (rc != OPAL_ASYNC_COMPLETION) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "opal_flash_async_op(op=%d) failed (rc %d)\n",
> > - op, rc);
> > + if (rc != OPAL_BUSY)
> > + dev_err(dev, "opal_flash_async_op(op=%d) failed (rc %d)\n",
> > + op, rc);
> > opal_async_release_token(token);
> > - rc = -EIO;
> > + rc = opal_error_code(rc);
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > - rc = opal_async_wait_response(token, &msg);
> > + rc = opal_async_wait_response_interruptible(token, &msg);
> > opal_async_release_token(token);
> > mutex_unlock(&info->lock);
> > if (rc) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "opal async wait failed (rc %d)\n", rc);
> > - return -EIO;
> > + if (rc == -ERESTARTSYS)
> > + rc = -EINTR;
> > + else
> > + dev_err(dev, "opal async wait failed (rc %d)\n", rc);
> > + return rc;
> > }
> >
> > rc = opal_get_async_rc(msg);
> > @@ -109,7 +113,7 @@ static int powernv_flash_async_op(struct mtd_info *mtd, enum flash_op op,
> > if (retlen)
> > *retlen = len;
> > } else {
> > - rc = -EIO;
> > + rc = opal_error_code(rc);
> > }
> >
> > return rc;
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list