[PATCH] powerpc/mm: Implemented default_hugepagesz verification for powerpc
victora
victora at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Jul 6 02:03:57 AEST 2017
Em 2017-07-05 01:26, Aneesh Kumar K.V escreveu:
> On Tuesday 04 July 2017 01:35 AM, Victor Aoqui wrote:
>> Implemented default hugepage size verification (default_hugepagesz=)
>> in order to allow allocation of defined number of pages (hugepages=)
>> only for supported hugepage sizes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Victor Aoqui <victora at br.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> b/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> index a4f33de..464e72e 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> @@ -797,6 +797,21 @@ static int __init hugepage_setup_sz(char *str)
>> }
>> __setup("hugepagesz=", hugepage_setup_sz);
>>
>> +static int __init default_hugepage_setup_sz(char *str)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long long size;
>> +
>> + size = memparse(str, &str);
>> +
>> + if (add_huge_page_size(size) != 0) {
>> + hugetlb_bad_size();
>> + pr_err("Invalid default huge page size
>> specified(%llu)\n", size);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 1;
>> +}
>> +__setup("default_hugepagesz=", default_hugepage_setup_sz);
>
> isn't that a behavior change in what we have now ? . Right now if size
> specified is not supported, we fallback to HPAGE_SIZE.
Yes, it is. However, is this a correct behavior? If we specify an
unsupported value, for example default_hugepagesz=1M and hugepages=1000,
1M will be ignored and 1000 pages of 16M (arch default) will be
allocated. This could lead to non-expected out of of memory/performance
issue.
>
> mm/hugetlb.c
>
> if (!size_to_hstate(default_hstate_size)) {
> default_hstate_size = HPAGE_SIZE;
> if (!size_to_hstate(default_hstate_size))
> hugetlb_add_hstate(HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER);
> }
>
>
>> +
>> struct kmem_cache *hugepte_cache;
>> static int __init hugetlbpage_init(void)
>> {
>>
>
> Even if we want to do this, this should be done in generic code and
> should not be powerpc specific
>
The verification of supported powerpc hugepage size (hugepagesz=) is
being performed on add_huge_page_size(), which is currently defined in
arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c. I think it makes more sense to implement
default_hugepagesz= verification on arch/powerpc, don't you think?
> -aneesh
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list